Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 October 16
| < October 15 | October 17 > |
|---|
October 16[edit]
Template:Dis-revert[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per T3. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Template:Dis-revert (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Used 3 times by 1 person (according to WhatLinksHere. Unused since 2008. →Στc. 20:42, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Territories forming part of the Commonwealth[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Template:Territories forming part of the Commonwealth (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Created to duplicate Template:The Commonwealth after users edits were reverted there. Meaningless duplication. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 17:01, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nominator, duplication with no reason to exist separately. —Yk Yk Yk talk ~ contrib 21:56, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.