Wikipedia:Peer review/Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch/archive1

Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch[edit]

I suspect that this is cutting it a bit close, but I was hoping to get some feedback on how to improve this article in the hopes that we can bring this up to FA quality in time for ~~1 April, 2006~~ 1 April, 2007 (not this year, I doubt we can bring it up that quicky). --D e athphoenix ʕ 18:50, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Get references and inline citations. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 18:52, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We have featured articles on a few other relatively small places - compare this article to Chetwynd, British Columbia and Yarralumla, Australian Capital Territory for examples of topics that could also be covered (demographics, geography, transport, economy, culture, recreation, politics). -- ALoan (Talk) 11:16, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't thing it's a good idea to have the map on the right hand-side of the page, and then a picture immediately on the left hand-side of the page. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 19:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gut reaction is this could struggle to get to FA without serious work, DYK? might be more realistic. The pronunication section needs to be more clearer and more accessible with the right style & characters. If you can squeeze out good, referenced prose on ALoan's points it has a chance. Don't feel confined to keeping everything relevant to the longest name thing, it's also a settlement in its own right. Nice one Deizio 16:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- (disclaimer: I haven't done any work on it, but would like to) I'm actually hoping to make this article more of a "normal place" type of an article with less emphasis on the long name. That would make the article seem even more April 1-worthy, IMO. I appreciate everyone's suggestions. --D e athphoenix ʕ 18:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]