Wikipedia:Article assessment/Natural disasters/Hurricane Floyd
Assessment of an article under the topic Natural disasters.
Article: Hurricane Floyd
Details of the assessment method can be found at the main page. Feel free to add comments when you assess an article, or use the talk page for discussion.
Review by violet/riga (t)[edit]
- Coverage and factuality: 10
- Excellent
- Writing style: 10
- Structure: 9
- The lead could be a little larger, but this is generally very good
- Aesthetics: 9
- Looks great
- Overall: 9
A good piece of work helped by constructive comments at the peer review. I'd recommend this as a FAC. violet/riga (t) 19:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Coverage and factuality: 8
Excellent referencing, appears to cover everything in excellent detail for an encyclopedia article. Some stuff isn't referenced, though, e.g. "Around 31,000 jobs were lost from over 60,000 businesses through the storm, causing nearly $4 billion in lost revenue. In much of the affected area, people were still forced to either boil water or buy bottled water as late as 2001."
- Writing style: 9
Almost perfect, but could be better.
- Structure: 10
Perfect.
- Aesthetics: 8
Some of the images are too close to each other, making it look crowded.
- Overall: 9
Good job. Like violet riga, I feel this would do well on FAC, provided the referencing problems were fixed. Johnleemk | Talk 09:52, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Review by [name][edit]
- Coverage and factuality:
- Writing style:
- Structure:
- Aesthetics:
- Overall: