User talk:Stephen/Archive Aug22Nov23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Stephen It's me again[edit]

Hello Stephen, It's been awhile. Hope you are doing well and you are keeping safe. I would like to request the New Page Reviewer right. I was asked a while back by another reviewer to consider becoming one but I felt I needed to get my hands more into article creation. I think I am ready to help contribute to the community in another capacity. Hopefully I can ease the backlog. I await your response with thanks.

Warm Regards,

Akim Ernest (talk) 01:05, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Akim, for NPP you should read the background and instructions at Wikipedia:New pages patrol, and once you are comfortable with the process you can apply for the right at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer. Good luck, Stephen 23:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright No Problem, Thanks for your response Stephen. Stay Safe. 😎 Akim Ernest (talk) 14:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Again Stephen I have formerly applied at the place you directed me to. It says administrators review them. If you get a chance hope you can have a look, thanks a lot. Have a Nice Day.
Here's the link: Akim Ernest Request for New page reviewer/permissions. - Wikipedia Akim Ernest (talk) 15:46, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).

Administrator changes

readded Valereee
removed Anthony Appleyard (deceased) • CapitalistroadsterSamsara

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
  • An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.

Technical news

  • The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
  • Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

  • You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
  • Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
  • Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:45, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Akim Ernest (talk) 21:56, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Another Admin Overruled your Decision.[edit]

Stephen please view what has transpired on the admin incident noticeboard I await your response. Akim Ernest (talk) 23:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That discussion has been closed. I misinterpreted the guidelines for the permission that you have sought, and concur with the other admin's removal. Stephen
It is very rare that I remove bits from an editor. In this case, my best guess is that it was an oversight or otherwise innocent mistake and that you would fully support the removal. We've all done the same before. Of course, had I thought it would be contentious in any way, I would have waited to discuss it with you. Dennis Brown - 12:00, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

REVDEL Enquiry for Offensive Edit Summary[edit]

Hi @Stephen,

Do you think it would be appropriate to use REVDEL to remove this offensive edit summary? I'm not familiar with REVDEL but this seems to be an appropriate use of the tool under point 2 of the "Criteria for redaction" (Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material).

Thanks for your help, aricooperdavis (talk) 13:32, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).

Guideline and policy news

  • A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
  • An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
  • The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

  • The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
  • Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:13, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Board of Trustees election[edit]

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 04:08, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election[edit]

Hello hello. I hope this message finds you well.

The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election ends soon, please vote. At least one of the candidates is worthy of support. --MZMcBride (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t just revert for the sake of reverting[edit]

On the Olivia Newton-John page, you have been reverting my edit seemingly for the sake of reverting it. I did originally change the infobox picture to one from Newton-John’s main period of notability, which was reverted, and Polyamorph reached out to me on my personal Talk page about it. I made it clear that I wasn’t aware of the original Talk page discussion and suggested that a hidden note be added. Polyamorph agreed with the suggestion and added the hidden note. I modified the wording of the hidden note, which made clear that the image should not be changed without a Talk page consensus. That is what you have been inexplicably reverting without a justifiable explanation. Is that seriously what you want to start an edit war over, something as uncontroversial as this, which reinforces said Talk page consensus and which was actually thanked by Polyamorph? TheScrubby (talk) 03:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's a CIR argument?[edit]

And how is that logo NOT an advertisement? HiLo48 (talk) 03:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a fair use image, part of the event name, that won't appear on the main page. It doesn't advertise or promote the brand by virtue of being at the top of the article. Stephen 03:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it does. That's why Toyota pays lots of money to the league so its logo will be seen. I live in the city where that game is played. Nobody there EVER uses the word Toyota as part of the name of the game. As far as common usage is concerned, it's not part of the name. HiLo48 (talk) 06:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That’s why the article doesn’t contain Toyota in the title, nor does the main page mention the brand. I guarantee that no-one in the Toyota/league sponsorship discussions listed appearing at the top a Wikipedia page as a benefit, the advertising is from the association at the game. Stephen 09:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What you guarantee is irrelevant. They seek ALL exposure their advertising budget achieves. HiLo48 (talk) 22:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 AFL Grand Final[edit]

Thank you taking the initiative in adding Isaac Smith to the blurb. Chrisclear (talk) 06:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:43, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus is actually against time frame on pics of deceased[edit]

I don't know why you insist that six month is required waiting time after death. Sorry, but the whole consensus lately or recently is against what you assert the waiting time to be. The April 2022 RfC discussion resulted in going against any "time frame" but goes by case-by-case basis instead. George Ho (talk) 22:59, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this about anything specific George Ho? Stephen 23:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I read a post sent to you, #Maurice Boucher (July 2022, a few months after the RFC). Oh, and the image was soon reinserted in the article after your removal attempt. Makes me wonder whether you were aware of the RfC discussion. If you were, then why didn't you participate? George Ho (talk) 23:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if you were aware of that discussion, then why still insisting the six-month rule? George Ho (talk) 23:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So your whining here is predicated on me being aware of that discussion? I don't think I've cared deeply about these issues for a few months now, so you won't need to bother me any further. Stephen 23:39, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'm not trying to argue mainly about your awareness. Indeed, you still attempted to unilaterally remove one of pics of deceased as "too soon after death". I wonder whether you will cease on doing that again, even as an admin. If you still have problems with using such pics as "too soon after death", why not WP:FFD instead? George Ho (talk) 23:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That discussion was months ago, I have no interest in that area any more. Stephen 02:54, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

Precious
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Racism at ITN[edit]

Restore your comment and you'll be blocked. Stephen 00:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What on Earth was 'racist' about it? It was a joke. I haven't a racist bone in my body. In 16 years on Wiki no one has ever accused me of 'racism.' I think you owe me an apology.
Sca (talk) 12:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your "joke" was based on the racist stereotype that East Asians, when speaking English, confuse /l/ and /r/. Stephen 23:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Stephen: Not at all! That was your interpretation of it, not my intention or motivation. It was simply a play on a word to substitute for "elected" – which Xi wasn't, not really. (And BTW, one of my closest friends from junior high through college and beyond was a second-generation Japanese-American whose last name was Ujifusa, and whose parents were interned during WWII.) I never dreamed that anyone would interpret my comment as a racial slur.
I still think you owe me an apology.Sca (talk) 11:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Happy now? – I'm distraught. Sca (talk) 17:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Local copy[edit]

When do you need a local copy? El_C 07:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, your talk page has nearly 200 sections going back years, so maybe consider removing __NOTOC__ since one has to scroll to the bottom every time. El_C 07:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you add the image at Wikipedia:Main Page/Commons media protection, just wait a few minutes and the bot will protect it at Commons and it’s listed at Commons:Auto-protected files/wikipedia/en . Thanks for the prompt on contents, I keep forgetting to archive. Stephen 07:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Thanks for the explanation, I forgot that page existed! El_C 08:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, remembering every nuance! And in this case someone had pre-emptively added him to the page already. You're help is always appreciated, best wishes. Stephen 08:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, much appreciated. My talk page record stands at 300+, but now I try not to let it get passed 69 (because... 69). Best regards, El_C 08:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I should let my threads get to 420 then… Stephen 08:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
👍 Like. A bit on the high end (boo!), but can't go wrong with the classics. El_C 12:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Richard96xxx[edit]

You might want to remove talk page access - they're still messing around. Pawnkingthree (talk) 23:23, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Pawnkingthree:, someone got to it before me. Stephen 23:44, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Bill Treacher[edit]

On 10 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article nominated, which you $2. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Thryduulf (talk) 17:58, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From my reading, consensus was reached and the article was of sufficient quality. I assume you disagree? DatGuyTalkContribs 20:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, misclick, didn’t notice. Stephen 20:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

E-Mail[edit]

Please contact the Arbitration Commitee at your earliest convenience. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:38, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Level II desysop of Stephen[edit]

The Arbitration Committee has determined, through the CheckUser tool, that Stephen (talk · contribs) has edited while logged out in a manner that harasses another user. The Committee has been unable to establish a satisfactory or alternative explanation after discussion with Stephen. Accordingly, the administrator privileges of Stephen are removed under the Committee's Level II removal procedures.

Supporting: WormThatTurned, Cabayi, Primefac, Donald Albury, Barkeep49, L235, CaptainEek, Izno, Beeblebrox

For the Arbitration Committee, CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 18:32, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Level II desysop of Stephen

For what it's worth[edit]

To be honest, I'm still not 110% convinced that you did what they say you did, only because it just seems so out of character. But assuming for the moment that you did: I still appreciate the work you've put into the project over the years, especially all the thankless main page work, and hope you find a path (and a desire) to regain everyone's trust.

But, that said, what I *really* hope - against pretty harsh odds, I suppose - is that this is all some horrible misunderstanding.

Either way, take care of yourself. I have, in my many years on earth, been a jerk to more than one person who didn't deserve it, and done many things I regret. We aren't defined by the bad things we do. You know? --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:18, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Floquenbeam, that means a lot. Stephen 23:13, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with everything that Floquenbeam has said, Stephen. You were an admin before I was and have been nothing but an amazing administrator and editor, in my experience. Thank you for every good action and contribution you've made here. Acalamari 03:27, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen - case request[edit]

Consistent with the Arbitration Committee's procedure on return of permissions following expedited removal, Stephen (talk · contribs) has requested that the Committee open normal arbitration proceedings to examine the removal of permissions and surrounding circumstances. Stephen has additionally requested that the case be heard privately, and the Committee agrees that there are significant privacy issues constituting extraordinary circumstances. Accordingly, the Committee directs its clerks to open an in camera arbitration case titled "Stephen", with no public evidence or workshop phase. Instead, relevant evidence may be submitted to the Arbitration Committee by email (arbcom-en@wikimedia.org).

For the Arbitration Committee, Primefac (talk) 18:24, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Stephen - case request
Hi Stephen, just wanted to let you know that the case page is now live at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Stephen. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 06:05, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

CheckUser changes

removed TheresNoTime

Oversight changes

removed TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen arbitration case closed[edit]

The Stephen arbitration case has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedy has been enacted:

  • The administrative permissions of Stephen are restored.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:08, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Stephen arbitration case closed
  • Welcome back, Stephen, I hope all is well with you and yours and wishing you well with whatever private matters led to the above now-concluded dramaz... We'll definitely appreciate the return of your hard work at ITN! Cheers,  — Amakuru (talk) 09:46, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Welcome back, looking forward to seeing you around ITN again! -- Pawnkingthree (talk) 19:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Welcome back, Stephen! I am glad to find that you were vindicated in the arb case. I have, through all these years, always found you to be a regular presence at the ITN, your work therein was of great value to the project. I hope you will continue it with the same inclination going forward too! Cheers, MBlaze Lightning (talk) 19:49, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Glad to have you back. ITN wasn't the same without you. --Jayron32 19:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    By the way, if you're looking to get back into admin tasks, there are some ITNC discussions that need an uninvolved admin to take care of. --Jayron32 12:35, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings[edit]

Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} [reply]

Donner60 (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

MBlaze Lightning (talk) 09:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition[edit]

"On DD/MM/YYYY, In the news was updated with an item that involved article XYZ, which you nominated and updated."

I was wondering how extensive one's edits/updates should be on an article nominated for RD for them to be recognized for updating the article?

Thank you! Mooonswimmer 03:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not aware that this is documented anywhere. I suspect it can be as much as a complete copy edit using obituary sources to as little as adding the date of death. I personally don't often check, and it’s a case of if the names are there when the item is posted they‘ll get the credit. It’s a minor thing at the end of the day. Stephen 09:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February songs[edit]

February songs
my daily stories

Thank you for taking care of ITN! - I was away for most of January. Now I write my own stories, today about a Ukrainian actress born OTD and a cantata that was performed 300 years ago (three days ago). -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

music today: the regional festival - DYK of 13 years ago ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My story on 24 February is about Artemy Vedel (TFA by Amitchell235), and I made a suggestion for more peace, - what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

today: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gerda, I appreciate your notes and kind thoughts. My knowledge of classical music and the performers is limited to the larger names and pieces, but it's cool that you take time to curate these articles and make sure they have their moments of recognition. Always ping me if you feel one is slipping past without due attention. Stephen 22:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Taking you up on the offer: due to vacation, I was late to nominate James Bowman (countertenor) for ITN, he died 27 Mar but I moved him to 28 Mar when the news of his death came around. Can you support? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "User is banned from ITN in any case." — Permit me to point out that I'm not banned from Main Page talk, a.k.a. ERRORS. Also, that the problem was obvious, and was recognized and promptly fixed courtesy of Ravenpuff. – Sca (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About your removal of my April Fools' ITN nomination[edit]

I thought it was allowed because it wasn't in a prohibited area. Also, can you not call something like that "trash"? It was a genuine attempt at Wikipedia humor. ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 03:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

April songs
my story today

... for bringing James Bowman to the Main page! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I loved to see Marian Anderson and her story of protest against discrimination by singing on Easter Sunday 9 April 1939 on the Main page yesterday (OTD). Impressions of Easter here and music here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My story today, Messiah (Handel), was my first dip into the FA ocean, thanks to great colleagues. - a few pics added, one day missing - I added to ITNN for 8 April, what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My story today is a great historic soprano with interesting bio and roles. I love that she was a choir singer first, at the Royal Opera at age 15 ;) - The 8 April nom made it, and one for 9 April is still on the Main page, but what do you think about the most recent one, Karl Berger? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Barry Humphries[edit]

On 27 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Barry Humphries, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ollieisanerd (talk) 20:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding ITN talk page[edit]

Hi. Regarding this comment, I respectfully disagree; these candidates had already been tagged ready for multiple days and were due to roll off within a few hours. As such, the next step would be to leave a gentle reminder at the talk page to get attention (which did work). This is a position advocated by multiple other admins active in ITN. As you know, we don't have as many admins actively working ITN as we used to, particularly with RD, so the process has been getting backed-up recently. Curbon7 (talk) 00:50, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We’ve always suggested using tags on the nomination, Ready or Needs attention. As you say clogging up the talk with multiple transient nudges isn’t going to attract any more admins who weren’t already looking to work RDs from the bottom of the queue, especially those who drop by to post the big stories at the top. Feel free to ping any recent active admin, including myself, inline to try and get some notice. Stephen 11:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Curbon7 (talk) 17:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May music[edit]

May songs
my story today

Thank you for RD help! - My story today is that 300 years ago, Bach became Thomaskantor, with BWV 75, writing music history. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Too tired for a new month: can you please check the RD nom for Peter Brötzmann? Last day, and I need sleep, - was out all day and couldn't respond. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Birthday[edit]

Per WP:BIRTHDAY, more than one wish is allowed for the same user. Thanks, Dinoz1 (chat?) (he/him) 11:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:34, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page Errors[edit]

Once again, Stephen, I am NOT banned from Main Page Errors, only from ITN/C itself. Your knee-jerk deletion of my comment at ERRORS yesterday was unfair and uncalled for, as it was simply topical in nature. Follow the rules. – Sca (talk) 12:51, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing red[edit]

Hey. Can you please explain to me the issue using non-blue versions of the {{archive top}}? I've noticed that you tend to remove them often (e.g, here). - Knightoftheswords281 (Talk · Contribs) 22:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We've pretty much always used the default version, adding extra colours is a distraction and calls unnecessary attention by making it look different. Stephen 22:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June thanks[edit]

June songs
my story today

Thank you help with the Recent deaths, especially Peter Brötzmann, - my story today. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please check out Rachel Yakar, nominated for RD, last day? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another late one on 10 Jul ITNN, iconic saxophonist who had no article yet, so it took some time. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet late, but could you take a look at Valentin Gheorghiu, 17 Jul - many initial opposes because a copyvio stub, but I think there now which isn't easy to see ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

Administrator changes

added Novem Linguae
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed MBisanz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN[edit]

Hi Stephen. I'm new to ITN, and I'm wondering where I can find more information on the consensus surrounding the types of stories that won't go to ITN. I looked at the guidelines before nominating, which seem to indicate that geography shouldn't matter. For example, WP:ITN#Arguments to avoid states:

"Arguments about a story relating to a particular geographic region, country, ethnicity, people group, etc. are generally seen as unhelpful. Almost all news is of greater interest to a particular place and/or group of people than to the world at large, and arguing that something should or should not be posted, solely because of where the event happened, or who might be "interested" in it because of its location, are not usually met with concurrence from the community."

As I also mentioned, NYC is a very large city, and the fact that it's city politics as opposed to national politics, in my view, shouldn't make a difference. But, it appears that there's some consensus at ITN that I'm not aware of, so I'd be grateful if you could point me in the right direction so I can learn more. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are no hard rules, or a page that lists stories that will be accepted, rather it's a consensus that has developed over the years. Yes, New York is a world city, but a story of politicking within that city is not significant enough on the world stage. We wouldn't post local city/state politics about anywhere else in the world so we don't post them about the US. Thanks for your contribution though, and please look for more stories to nominate. Stephen 00:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Given that it's a consensus and you speedy closed the nom, seems like a hard rule to me. I think having some sort of list of topics that generally lack consensus would be beneficial for folks like me who waltz into ITN without a clue. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
By hard rule I mean an absolute black-and-white documented case. I've been around long enough to know stories that don't stand a chance of getting posted, but if you want more input you're entitled to reopen it. Stephen 02:07, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to relitigate it by reopening my nom. As noted, I thought my nom was within the rules as specified at ITN (including the alleged community consensus RE the geographical scope of a story). The fact that it was not and everyone's response is just "that's how it is at ITN" feels a bit CABAL-ish. I think I'll bring my thoughts over the ITN talk page and try to make some suggestions from the perspective of an editor who is not regularly involved at ITN. Thanks for your time. voorts (talk/contributions) 11:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive feedback[edit]

F U C K Y O U!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.132.109.74 (talk) 02:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

Administrator changes

added Firefangledfeathers
removed

Interface administrator changes

added Novem Linguae

Technical news

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
  • A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

Miscellaneous

  • Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sca's sanction[edit]

Reviewing the ANI thread, Sca's talk page, and the list of active editing restrictions, I see that Beeblebrox p-blocked Sca from WP:ITN/C. There wasn't any consensus in the ANI thread to topic-ban Sca from ITN as a whole, and I don't think Beeblebrox could have or would have imposed that sanction unilaterally. I don't believe that Sca should be prevented from posting to ERRORS. Courtesy pings to Sca and Firefangledfeathers. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The spirit of the ban was to exclude contributions to ITN which is obviously mostly at ITNC, but also occurs at Errors. Schwede66 has concurred in the past and performed similar actions. Stephen 22:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about the duplicate section. I see S66 gave Sca the suggestion to avoid the ITN part of Errors. I think that's good advice, but I don't think we can mandate it (absent some further restriction). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sca[edit]

Stephen, you say that Sca is "banned from ITN". I'm not aware of any such sanction, but maybe you could point it out to me. I'm aware of the pblock from ITN/C, but a pblock does not prevent commenting about the sanctioned page. It's not a tban, with the "broadly construed" baggage. For example, when we pblock people from articles, they still routinely edit the associate talk page. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The thread immediately above discusses the same thing. I’m happy to step away from such actions if everyone’s correcting me. Stephen 22:56, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's been almost a year since I was banned from ITN/C because of an ill-considered remark that was misconstrued by some as a racist/ethnic slur. As said repeatedly, nothing could have been further from my mind at the time. I am committed to equal rights and equal respect for all, regardless of ethnicity or LGBTQ identity, as can be seen from my user page.
In the interval, I've quietly continued involvement in other areas of Wikipedia, such as WP:FPC, and engaged in random copy-editing of articles I encountered, making about 700 contributions. With respect, I suggest it's time to reconsider (i.e., rescind) this partial block on a volunteer who's been a user for almost 20 years. Thank you. -- Sca (talk) 13:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That was one of the worst jokes I've ever read online. Not even just the parts any reasonable person might recognize as inappropriate and offensive, but the subtle nuances, too. It's not unforgivable, especially given all the good you otherwise do, but I must ask the judges to let you serve the full year for this one. InedibleHulk (talk) 13:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nettie Stevens[edit]

Don't understand why you deleted the link to Thomas Hunt Morgan. (So happens I once lived in Lexington, Ky., so I thought to differentiate Thomas Hunt Morgan from the locally famous Confederate general John Hunt Morgan.) -- Sca (talk) 12:39, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was already linked above. Stephen 15:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. Sorry. -- Sca (talk) 13:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Precious anniversary[edit]

Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have another last-minute RD nom, Carmen Petra Basacopol, please check. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:21, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Haydn Gwynne[edit]

On 26 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Haydn Gwynne, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 21:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the news talk page[edit]

Hi, would you please explain the reason of this edit. 3000MAX (talk) 02:05, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the edit summary, and get the ping on WP:Errors? That's where minor blurb changes are discussed usually. Stephen 05:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October music[edit]

October songs
my story today

Thank you for ITN quality! - Towards the end of the month, I thought of Brian Bouldton, and his ways to compromise, - with musings about peace there, - feel free to join. Hevenu shalom aleichem. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

E. coli close[edit]

Howdy, just a heads up - while I agreed with the SNOW, I'd un-closed the e. coli outbreak nom only due to JM (the closer) having participated in voting, and by the criteria on (non-admin closure). No harm meant, I informed JM of the guidelines for the future as well. The Kip 04:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I didn’t notice that. Stephen 08:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail![edit]

Hello, Stephen. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 18:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

BangJan1999 18:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

Administrator changes

added 0xDeadbeef
readded Tamzin
removed Dennis Brown

Interface administrator changes

added Pppery
removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
  • Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
  • Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
  • Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
  • Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
  • Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
  • An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Beaches[edit]

Dear Stephen, Why did you remove Gordon from the transport section of the Northern Beaches, there is a bus from Gordon to the Northern Beaches and the source is reliable

@RichardHornsby:, because you also removed a sentence for no reason. Please use a heading and sign if you leave a message on someone's talk page. Stephen 20:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Johnny Ruffo[edit]

On 12 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Johnny Ruffo, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 07:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail![edit]

Hello, Stephen. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 21:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

JamesMitu2 21:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Umm... what?[edit]

I take the liberty to be dismayed by Your revert [1], mate, made without any comment to me. I take it to be bad tone. --Ouro (blah blah) 11:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Polyamorph (talk) 11:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]