User talk:Rock Stone Gold Castle/Archive 1

Archive 1

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page T20. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

BCCI Good article nomination

There is not a chance that Board of Control for Cricket in India meets the criteria for good articles- there are 4 sections that have maintenance tags (either for needing more content, or need updating), which would be an automatic fail at a GA nomination. And that's before looking at all the inline tags like citation needed. Before nominating articles for GA, can you at least check that it meets all the criteria for a GA? This article is nowhere near good enough to be a GA. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:33, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vizzy Trophy

The article Vizzy Trophy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The tournament is not first-class and it lacks notability. BoJó | talk UTC 13:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BoJó | talk UTC 13:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Vizzy Trophy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vizzy Trophy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vizzy Trophy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BoJó | talk UTC 15:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Board of Control for Cricket in India

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Board of Control for Cricket in India you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 16:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Board of Control for Cricket in India

The article Board of Control for Cricket in India you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Board of Control for Cricket in India for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 17:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sport in India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Star Sports, Manali and Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Parsi Gymkhana, Marine Drive

added a link pointing to Hindu Gymkhana

Ranji Trophy

added a link pointing to Nawanagar

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maharashtra Open, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dunlop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Cirkus (film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

But i think for obvious things or the subjects are in public domain doesn't everytime need source. Everybody knows that Avatar released 1 week before Cirkus, isn't it? Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 07:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ajit Doval, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baba Ramdev.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Board of Control for Cricket in India

Hi, sir, this article need cleanup, ce and do check its grammar. But keep it as we British and Indian English readers can read easily. Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 06:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Rock Stone Gold Castle, please note GOCE is not Cleanup, that's a different WikiProject. Although there's some overlap, please don't conflate the two processes. I'm not here to clean up messes made by incompetent editors. I'm aware of ENGVAR. Thanks, Baffle☿gab 03:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

I'm now done; I've removed one off-topic paragraph to the talk page and I've replied to your comments there. The article is still a long way from the GA standard and a copy-edit alone won't fix that. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 09:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Matrix Fight Night for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matrix Fight Night is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matrix Fight Night until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HeinzMaster (talk) 13:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Too many requests on the GOCE Requests page

The Guild of Copy Editors has implemented a limit of two (2) copy edit requests at a time for any one editor on the Requests page. You recently posted a third request. I have removed your most recent request.

Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience. (Also, please let me know if I am in error with this message.) – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ranji Trophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star Sports.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Board of Control for Cricket in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's Premier League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kalaram mandir satyagraha

Hello, Rock Stone Gold Castle,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username BoyTheKingCanDance, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Kalaram mandir satyagraha, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BoyTheKingCanDance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Please be more careful

In your edit to The Big Bang Theory you claimed that an Indian actress was suing Netflix over having been insulted in an episode. I'm glad you provided a citation, because it clearly states that it's a political analyst suing Netflix, not the actress. DonIago (talk) 13:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC) @Doniago:, Hi, in the source article, the political analyst said, my client felt hurt got hurted due to the dialogue and title say Madhuri Dixit Vs Netflix/Big Bang theory. So it's clear that Madhuri sued Netflix.Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 15:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Kumar doesn't actually say that he's representing Dixit, and Dixit herself apparently hasn't commented on the lawsuit at this time, so while we might infer that he represents her, it's not explicitly stated.

Though, on a personal note, I also don't know why he's suing Netflix, as they didn't make the show. DonIago (talk) 16:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

@Doniago: I think Netflix is streaming it in India that's why. He said his client hurted due to that dialogue and Title of it said "Madhuri Dixit Vs Netflix" so it indicate that Madhuri sued Netflix but anathor article [1] indicating Mithun Vijay Kumar, a political analyst sued Netflix India.Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 16:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure I understood your comment, but regardless of the name of the case, which may or may not clearly indicate who the involved parties are, I'm still not seeing anything that indicates explicitly that Kumar is representing Dixit. You're welcome to discuss this at the article's Talk page if you'd like input from additional editors. DonIago (talk) 17:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your right he is not representing Madhuri, he sent notice himself to Netflix. Some source are saying he sent notice others are saying he sued.Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 17:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2019 Indian Premier League

The article 2019 Indian Premier League you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2019 Indian Premier League for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Stevie fae Scotland -- Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 15:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Maharashtra

Hi Rock Stone Gold Castle, I'm Baffle gab1978, a coordinator with the Guild of Copy Editors. I've removed your copy-edit request for Maharashtra from our Requests page because the page has a limit of two requests per editor at any one time, and you already have two articles listed there. We enforce this limit to ensure all requests have a fair chance of being dealt with in a reasonable time. In this case, your most-recent request, for Bhimashankar Temple, has already been accepted. If you'd like Maharashtra to be copy-edited first, feel free to swap it with Indian Premier League; otherwise, you can re-add the removed request once one of your other requests has been processed. Thaks for your patience and understanding. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

I've reverted your most-recent addition here for the reason stated above; please wait for one of your requests to be completed before adding any more requests. I'm sorry I didn't explain clearly enough for you; we have a limit of two (2) c/e requests per editor at any one time. Thanks, Baffle☿gab 15:13, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Netflix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Bang Theory.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2023 Indian Premier League

The article 2023 Indian Premier League you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2023 Indian Premier League for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 09:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Category:Online tickets selling Android applications in India has been nominated for deletion

Category:Online tickets selling Android applications in India has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 01:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Indian Premier League, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please make sure to double-check spelling and grammar before you publish a change to a Wikipedia article. Wracking ^💬 16:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Indian Premier League, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I recommend checking out the essay WP:TRUTH to learn about what kind of information we share on Wikipedia. Wracking ^💬 16:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Joseph2302. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2023 Indian Premier League, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Don't re-add South African broadcaster without adding a source at the same time. There was no source on the table for it Joseph2302 (talk) 10:10, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Instead of this artificial message, if you told me clearly what the improvement you want from me, it would be great. I think Wisden is a reliable source and it said Super Sport will air IPL 2023 in South Africa. Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 11:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure Joseph is referring to this edit of yours, in which you undid a prior deletion of content for which no source had been provided, though paradoxically your edit summary suggests that you believed you were removing unsourced content. Is it possible you didn't revert the edit you intended to revert? DonIago (talk) 13:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Ok, I somewhere read that Super sports gonna air it. Its ok, if the info isn't correct you can undo it. Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 13:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Nevermind that "truth", brother, if I see you spreading any misinformation, disinformation or ballyhooed promotional consideration in the world of sport superstars I know, I'll do more than undo, I'll do whatever a spider can, and that's the bottom line 'cause The Hulkster's Cena Nuff, webslinger! And no, I don't mean that exclamation point in an abusive or derogatory way. Spiders are cool, I'm just saying, keep your eyes on the prize and please thread carefully. InedibleHulk (talk) 07:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Heyo

Hey,

What languages do you speak? I think you can learn the Wikipedia policies to help you edit this Wiki, just curious what you speak. (I can speak Hindi and English myself).

I think you could use someone giving you a short course on all Wikipedia policies. Your English is not great, but there's other parts of Wikipedia you can focus on.

Soni (talk) 12:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

I am ready to take help, You should tell the editor, who are discussing about me, that your helping me, we'll figure it out. But I'm feeling little disheartened due to that harsh words by other experienced editors at AN/I. I think, I need a long break from WP.Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 05:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

I have already commented on WP:ANI about my thoughts. Now the editors there can decide what they want finally.

The main question for me is "What sort of edits you want to do on Wikipedia" and "Do you even want to edit English Wikipedia". I don't know what other languages you speak, but say Hindi wikipedia or Marathi wikipedia might be simpler. Many of our other language Wikis need editors as well. Once you decide both of this, let me know.

If you plan to continue editing on English wikipedia, I can start with explaining the basics and things you should/shouldn't do here.

P.S. It's good to use {{ping|Soni}} just after commenting something you want me to see. That way, I get a ping. For example, @Rock Stone Gold Castle: would have given you a ping.

Soni (talk) 05:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

To be blunt

I'll repeat here what I wrote on AN/I:

You have already been assured that no one doubts your good faith, and we are quite tolerant here of editors at many levels of English competence, but it is simply the case that your English skills are not sufficient for you to be creating articles here. You demonstrate that in your articles, and you demonstrate that in every comment you post. It is not true that, as you write, your "language is not that bad": it is bad. Not to put too fine a point on it You cannot write English well enough to write for an English language encyclopedia. This is not a blog, or a personal website in which simply getting the gist of what you want to say across to the reader is sufficient. You must be able to write in English with encyclopedic quality, at least as well as a student in secondary school, and preferably better than that.

As several people have pointed out, there are Wikipedias in other languages, and probably one in your native tongue. Please take the advice that has been offered to you, and create articles for that encyclopedia, and keep your activities here to those things that don't require you to write in proper and coherent English. We're happy that you want to volunteer to help, but you're not helping here, you are hurting English Wikipedia. Your native language Wikipedia will almost certainly welcome you with open arms, so please transfer your desire to create articles there.

I am sorry to be so blunt, but you clearly are not catching on to what you're being told. If you don't stop creating articles, or even expanding existing articles, it is inevitable that the choice will be taken out of your hands, and some administrator will block you in some manner. It would be so much better for you to simply accept the advice that numerous long-time editors have given you, and leave of your own accord. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

@Beyond My Ken:, Hi, yes you hurted me very badly. I know, I hurted some editors ego, that's why they tried me to push to the wall. I live in a free country, I am taking a break from WP due to you and other editor's harsh treatment with me at AN/I. If I edited, I'll make sure to edit with negligible or no mistakes. People like you need to understand, not everyone's 1st Lang is US or UK English, there are other versions of Eng exist in this world. Not everyone is privileged like you, we people from lower income countries not able to get quality edu, you should use civil language against less experienced editors. Bad behaviour from people like you creates bad perception about English speaking people in the world. Its clear that you have zero tolerance about new editors. I don't want make conversation with people like, please leave me alone. Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 09:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

No, you did not get "hurted", you got "hurt", and the fact that you don't know how to properly use that simple irregular verb is the nub of the problem here. And, yes, I am intolerant, but not of "new editors", I am intolerant of any editor who cannot express themselves in English without making a complete mess out of it.

To be clear, I do not care one tiny bit what country an editor comes from, what the color of their skin is, how much education they have, what class they are part of, how much money they or their parents have, what religion they practice, if any, or what their first or second or third language is. All I care about is that when they contribute material to this Wikipedia, they do so in clear, grammatical, well-written English sentences and paragraphs. If they cannot do that, then they cannot write here. This is not a charity, it is not a self-help program, it is not a place to bolster your self-respect, or to work on your English skills. It is a serious educational project to build a quality English-language encyclopedia. Those who cannot do that because they cannot write sufficiently well in English can certainly help here in other ways, but, simply said, if they cannot write English well enough, then they cannot write here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:34, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

• I've looked at the entire discussion and tried to see it from every angle. I get that you are frustrated with Ken's responses to you, RSGC. But I can also see Ken's frustrations. I'm not going to pile on in either case. I don't know if English is your native language or not or if you just have an issue with proper encyclopedic English (something I can struggle with at times) but, if your native language is something other than English then I suggest you take what other editors are saying to heart and join that Wikipedia and add content there. You can still make contributions to English Wikipedia, just not content creation or editing of existing articles. I do not see where anyone questions your good faith. The fact that Ken and others have tried to discuss this with you for this length of time demonstrates the exact opposite. They are trying to steer you, a good faith contributor, on to a positive path and avoid having you indefinitely blocked from being able to contribute in any capacity. I do believe that frustration boiled over in some instances which caused you hurt. I'm sorry that you were hurt in the process but you should take that hurt and channel it into a positive direction which I believe is the intention of all of these editors taking their time to try and explain things to you. No one here is against you. That should be very evident despite your feelings. When you return, please, listen to the advice given. --ARoseWolf 18:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

  Thanks @ARoseWolf: for your friendly gesture, guy like you are seldom. But I decided to take a break. Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 02:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for your inability to contribute at a necessary level of English.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kinu ^t/_c 04:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rock Stone Gold Castle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, admins, I already cleared that I was contributing in WP with good faith, I agree with the discussion at WP : AN/I that I should my own avoid doing big edits. A well experienced editors also said that, I'm a good faith editor. I am assuring you, I'll 100% not cause any harm to the wp, I will only do small edits to avoid grammar mistakes. By seeing my old record in which, I never did edit warring and spoke polity with everyone, you should give me a second chance. Everyone deserves a second chance. I am also learning and we learn with the experience. Even I decided to take a wiki break, I don't want to get block from namespace. I myself reported spammers, vandals or promotional accounts at AN/I, If command me to not write new articles, I'll not writte, if I felt to write one, I'll submit it to AFC. I request you to unblock me from namespace. Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 06:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I must agree with the other editors who have spoken to you on this page. Your English skill is insufficient to participate here, and you should participate at the Wikipedia of your primary language. There is nothing special about the English Wikipedia, it is not the premier Wikipedia. Once you spend time editing the Wikipedia of your primary language and maybe spend that time improving your English skills, you may later be ready to participate here. This request, however, only confirms that you are not, and as such I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 10:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Indian cricketers association moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Indian cricketers association, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Cricket Centre moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cricket Centre, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Vijay Merchant Trophy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vijay Merchant Trophy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Book My Show moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Book My Show, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UtherSRG (talk) 10:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chakda Xpress

Hello, Rock Stone Gold Castle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chakda Xpress, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mujrim (1958 film)

Hello, Rock Stone Gold Castle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mujrim".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)