Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamshid Kaveh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
There is significant coverage and this is not posted on "some blog." This is the company's news website affiliated with NBC, ABC, CNN, CBC especially all of the sources attached and noted. It DOES meet standard for citations. There is nothing out of order here whatsoever. Tell me: Do you just glance and decline pages just because it doesn't fit "your standards" even though you have no qualification to say it doesn't meet the criteria for Journalist? Or are you actually taking the time to see and examine that not only is there multiple sources backing up this wikipedia article but with the company's news site running since 1996 to do so? RThomas29 (talk) 20:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, RThomas29!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is significant coverage and this is not posted on "some blog." This is the company's news website affiliated with NBC, ABC, CNN, CBC especially all of the sources attached and noted. It DOES meet standard for citations. There is nothing out of order here whatsoever. RThomas29 (talk) 19:54, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tell me: Do you just glance and decline pages just because it doesn't fit "your standards" even though you have no qualification to say it doesn't meet the criteria for Journalist? Or are you actually taking the time to see and examine that not only is there multiple sources backing up this wikipedia article but with the company's news site running since 1996 to do so? RThomas29 (talk) 20:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
