User talk:Piaadibe

This is Piaadibe's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Siedel (December 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Will need all additional in-depth sourcing because, although holding a distinguished chair at a major school is notable, this is still not sourced enough to accept.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Siedel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:George Siedel has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:George Siedel. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:George Siedel has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:George Siedel. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Siedel (March 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Zero sources that are not directly connected to Siedel. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Siedel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 20:19, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Siedel has been accepted[edit]

George Siedel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

Based on your contributions, ,it appears that you are likely to have some degree of WP:Conflict of Interest wit the subject of the article George Siedel. If so it is absolutely necessary that you declare it, according to our policy specified there. In addition, if you are a paid editor, see our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure .If you have further changes to make on the article, suggest them on the article talk pageß. DGG ( talk ) 17:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I have not been paid by Professor Siedel. However, I contacted him during the process to ask his opinion about the draft article. I appreciate the information you provided and, unless you advise otherwise, will put edits through peer review instead of into the articles directly. As a matter of fact, I had assumed that all the edits were under peer review (not only the initial page creation). Thank you again for the instructions. Piaadibe 12:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)