User talk:Mariguld

Hello, Mariguld! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Petrb (talk) 15:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Secular phenomena[edit]

I've removed your added text again, and placed my reasoning on the talk page. This is getting quite out of hand at this point, and I strongly encourage you to actually discuss this issue rather than just continue with the drive-by reversions that have been happening for months now. siafu (talk) 20:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mariguld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It seems my user name is still blocked by User:2over0 for mistaking "sockpuppet" with User:Kurtan. I am not expert of astronomy but it is one of my interests, especial if no big bang articles. Seems Kurtan has too, but often end with conflicting opinions of other users. So I try to find good references. The real sockpuppet here seems to be an old long time blocked user who is editing again from several new IP-addresses. Mariguld (talk) 23:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Contrary to what you seem to think, having a common interest in astronomy is by no means the only evidence of a link between the two accounts. There is much more evidence. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:38, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mariguld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not informed of what evidence of a link there is, so to show that I understand why you may find some link, I can only guess it is my short edit record. The contact with Kurtan started after I tried to put a translation of my Japanese Masreliez-article on the Swedish wp on 2010-10-06. It was very fast deleted, since a better version had already been deleted in 2006. So I had put myself into the hornet's nest by supporting Masreliez. He presents a full cosmology that adress a lot of fenomena with separate articles. It is very easy to find the articles at issue by following edits of the four IPs that the VanishedUser3,14158 had been using, see edit history of Tired light, where others tried to support Masreliez. I will try to avoid cosmology edit war situations in future. When time permits contibute more on things Japanese and childrens books. The block is not necessary since block reason does not apply to my case. /Mariguld (talk) 12:45 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sock of Mr Gearloose (talk · contribs). TN X Man 16:51, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mariguld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, Mr Gearloose (talk · contribs) is familiar to me from someof his edits on Swedish WP. Some of them on same articles as I have edited.That is our only connection. I do not know who this guy is, we have nevermet, talked or had any communication whatsoever (except maybe for one or twoinformation edits on WP). What I have understand of the “Checkuser”´s role,it can tell IP-numbers of signed edits. And so find out links between twoaccounts? But I cannot understand when and how “Checkuser confirm sock”here, except that we may have used the same computer somewhere (in Stockholmarea). But he is not me, so there is no big deal? Mariguld (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So, out of all the computers I would presume exist in Stockholm, you just happened to use the same one as someone whose behavior matches yours too? Sorry, not buying that one. I've revoked your talk page access since at this point no admin is going to be willing to unilaterally unblock, you can contact the Ban Appeals Subcommittee if you feel the need, but I'd advise being honest if you choose to. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Would it not be reasonable that the distinguist administrator state when the sock-edit occurred, in order to sort out the less than a dozen computers that could be involved??

83.251.96.56 (talk) 18:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]