User talk:LilitAsatryan

Your submission at AfC Arsen Grigoryan was accepted[edit]

Arsen Grigoryan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LilitAsatryan (talk) 19:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC LilitAsatryan was accepted[edit]

LilitAsatryan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LilitAsatryan (talk) 09:45, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, LilitAsatryan. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 13:38, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arsen Grigoryan[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arsen Grigoryan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SmartSE (talk) 13:39, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GOLFBOO[edit]

I would suggest reading WP:WEB about notability for websites, and WP:RS about the reliable independent sources needed to prove the notability. The references you used were almost all PR stuff and promotional rather than independent coverage. They could have been written by the company (or by an agency, on their behalf...). The odd one out was a very brief account of a change that seems to have been made. The article was still over promotional, Saying things like "As a company, GOLFBOO aims to revolutionise and modernise the game of golf becoming a golfers one stop shop for their golf getaway!" is not what an encyclopaedia is about. We insist on formal and neutral wording in articles, and PR style wording is totally out of the question. Please remember that not every company, website, or individual gets an article. It's not size, it's not nobility of cause, it's not even being unique. It's WP:RS coverage of something that passes the notability policy. By the way, if you are work for the company, or are being paid to edit be them, please read WP:COI. Peridon (talk) 13:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC[edit]

This is to let you know that your name has been removed from the list of AfC reviewers. There is a minimum qualification of 500 mainspace edits in order to sign up to review articles at AfC. Wikipedia is not a game. Please do not sign up to do things you are not qualified to do. Your talk page paints a picture of an editor who is not very well versed in the concepts of article creation. Why would you want to sign up to help others with a skill you have not yet mastered? John from Idegon (talk) 22:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arsen Grigoryan (January 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BenLinus1214 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arsen Grigoryan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BenLinus 1214^talk 14:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! LilitAsatryan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BenLinus 1214^talk 14:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Arsen Grigoryan concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arsen Grigoryan, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arsen Grigoryan[edit]

Hello, LilitAsatryan. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Arsen Grigoryan".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rich^T|C|E-Mail 20:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]