User talk:KuwarOnline/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Email this user
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




Welcome to my talk page! Feel free to leave comments, critiques, etc., below. Unless you specifically request that I answer on your talk page, I'll be answering here, as I prefer to keep as much of the conversation in one place as possible. Thanks!


WikiProject Java (announcements)[edit]

  • NEW! The meaning of all this is that the 'startup' phase of the Java project is finished. The project now switches to its 'mature' phase. I encourage you to put your name in the todo page after one of the remaining tasks. You can also aim to be Coordinator if you so desire. (2010-05-13)
  • Great day kids! All 1482 Java pages are now importance-assessed. From now on, let's increase article quality! (2010-05-11)
  • We reached another important milestone: all 1450 Java pages are now quality-assessed. Let's finish importance assessment! (2010-04-25)
  • Hello guys and dolls, good news! Our second Cleanup listing is now available. So, no more excuses for laziness, let's get to work, all of us... (2010-03-24)
  • Totally awesome news! Our project was featured in this edition (2010-03-08) of the Wikipedia Signpost (2010-03-09)
  • Big news again, we now have 300 images within the project scope with more to come soon! (2010-03-02)
  • Last month ranking stats for the WikiProject Java articles is here. (2010-02-01)
  • Current monthly ranking stats for the WikiProject Java articles is here. (2010-01-01)
  • Hello guys and dolls, good news! Our first meaningful Cleanup listing is now available. (2009-12-11)
  • Hello everybody! Now that we are at least 5 members, we are able to officialize this thing. Don't you think it would be great if each one of us proudly displayed his membership by placing the Java Userbox on its user (or talk) page... (2009-10-23)
  • Hi supporters of the WikiProject Java! And thanks for your support. Now that we are more than 5 supporters, I gather from the Wikipedia guidelines that we CAN proceed with the groundwork, for releasing the project and portal in the open soon. To that effect, we would appreciate it very much if you could copy your name in the List of participants page. (2009-10-23)
  • All members of WikiProject Java are urged to install the Centralized Announcement System on their talk page. (2009-10-23)



Speedy deletion of Template:Indian expressways[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Indian expressways requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Imzadi 1979  19:23, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reverted your all edits regarding expressways in India. I think it would be better if we discuss before deleting, changing template, I dont think its duplication to any template. It has its good look and feel, more aesthetically pleasing than the rather bland Template:infobox road, If you still feels this template is duplicate please start discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion. KuwarOnline Talk 05:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion was opened at WT:INR, and when no comments were forthcoming, a test of the expressway articles was made, a test that you've rollbacked. The Indian templates violate MOS:FLAG by using the Indian flag at the top. Once the template was not in use, it was eligible for deletion under the CSD criteria T3 (not in use, and duplicates the function of another template). As for the look and feel, I disagree. {{Infobox road}} has been redesigned to work globally (almost 50 countries are supported), to comply with Accessbility guidelines, and to set up the color of the headers in the template to be customizable for any country. Autostrada A26 (Italy) will demonstrate that, as the Italian articles all use the same color green from the signage and the previous Italian infobox. The United States and Canada are switching to the shade of green that matches our guide signs, with brown as an option for historic and scenic highways. Canada is also going to use blue for their freeways. There are color schemes set up in the template to support the blue and yellow for Germany, or the blue/white, green/yellow and black/white of the United Kingdom. Imzadi 1979  07:39, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't understand, first if want to make test edits then u could have done for say 1 or 2 article not 18 articles, If you were doing test edits then why you nominated template for deletion? or you doing other way like removing all link and then nominate of deletion on name of test edits?, Anyways I would really suggest that no good I idea to use normal template for expressway article, if expressway template violates any rule, then I need to fixed and make it as per polices, not delete/removed from wikipedia. As I said earlier If you still feels this template is duplicate/not necessary/useless etc etc. please start discussion/nominate for deletion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 July 2. Whatever the result would be we will comply to that. KuwarOnline Talk 09:01, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Rschen7754 05:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Basically the issue is that rollback is for reverting vandalism only. 18 edits is a *lot* and that is why I brought it up to ANI, as it indicates a misunderstanding of the rollback policy. However, as long as you only use rollback for reverting vandalism it shouldn't be a problem again. (Wikipedia:Rollback feature) --Rschen7754 05:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The user User talk:Imzadi1979 changed template to all pages of expressway, which I reverted and the discussion is underway, till time I reverted his all edits regarding changed in template. Once the discussion ends, whatever will be the result, will change according. I used rollback function because it was more, if it would have 1 or 2, I would have used normal undo. Certainly not misused. KuwarOnline Talk 05:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How is that vandalism? --Rschen7754 05:48, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please remove my rollback right, Certainly in future I will only use rollback to revert mass edits, so it better, I should not have it. thanks KuwarOnline Talk 05:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

talkback[edit]

Hello, KuwarOnline. You have new messages at Template talk:Indian expressways.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Misleading Topicon[edit]

Since you have asked for the rollback bit to be removed, and that it has been done, you should remove the topicon from your user and talk pages. Codf1977 (talk) 07:01, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh, thanks, I almost forgot, thanks for reminding. KuwarOnline Talk 07:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, KuwarOnline. You have new messages at Fastily's talk page.
Message added 21:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The article Nelito Systems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. References given are press releases, internal or references to the parent company. Google search does not pick up anything to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 12:11, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If google doesnt pick anything to establish notability then how to find reference? KuwarOnline Talk 12:19, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated Nelito Systems, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelito Systems. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. noq (talk) 13:57, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hotels in Delhi[edit]

I would suggest getting User:KuwarOnline/List of hotels in Delhi back up and working in some form. The alexa site stats says it has pretty high importance on google india [1] , it would be a good way to improve Wikipedia traffic. Sadads (talk) 15:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I didnt understand the first line you said, can explain more? thanks KuwarOnline Talk 16:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you have a pretty good draft, and I see that the you salvaged it when it was deleted the first time. If you could rebuild it, addressing the issues of the deletion discussion, then it would be good for Wikipedia. Examples of similar pages include Hotels in Istanbul, List of hotels in Dubai, and List of Las Vegas Strip hotels. Sadads (talk) 16:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I will start working on it. If you suggest anything to improve, please do so. It was deleted under Wikipedia:CSD#G11 KuwarOnline Talk 17:13, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, KuwarOnline. You have new messages at Codf1977's talk page.
Message added 11:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Courtyard by Marriott Mumbai[edit]

Thank you for your message. I've restored the article to User:KuwarOnline/Courtyard by Marriott Mumbai. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:42, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...[edit]

...that answers something I was wondering and removes an item from my to-do list. TFOWR 13:07, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

welcome, today I might complete articles around 200 at least... from A to C from Category:Articles needing link rot cleanup

Orphaned non-free image File:Nellogo.jpg[edit]

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Nellogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scrollbars[edit]

I saw your note on User talk:Nigel Ish. WP:SCROLL is the relevant guideline. - BilCat (talk) 12:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Info :) KuwarOnline Talk 12:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scrolling references[edit]

Scrolling references are prohibited here - Citing_sources#Avoid_scrolling_lists - they stop printing and cause accessibility problems, and can make it harder for readers to see the fulkl list.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for info :) KuwarOnline Talk 11:17, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, KuwarOnline. You have new messages at MGA73's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback[edit]

Hello, KuwarOnline. You have new messages at File talk:Bangalore Rajdhani Express.jpg.
Message added SBC-YPR (talk) 21:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Durgapur Xpressway.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Durgapur Xpressway.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 08:06, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I already sent permission mail to permission-en AT wikipedia DOT org. KuwarOnline Talk 08:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi...Although I appreciate your warning, I by no means, am indulging in 'disruptive' editing of the IGI page. The article suggests the Delhi is the second busiest airport in India after Mumbai in terms of passengers... Not only is it wrong but the fact that you dont read news papers makes it weirder that you are accusing me of making disruptive changes. Delhi is busiest in terms of passengers and aircraft movement Delhi has last year handled 26.2M passengers per annum compared to BOMs 25.8. So please check your sources back...I guess ill make an account again(My last account being hacked)and then make changes and back it up with a reference but I guess you as a prime contributor to WIKI India sections should take into consideration the changes before shooting emails.I am not vandalizing the thread I assure you. Period

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.9.38 (talk) 22:24, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, As you removed the complete sentence without reading the sources added to prove that claim, if you have any better/quality sources that says that delhi is most busiest in term of passenger traffic add it to article and remove the claim I made, As you said "So please check your sources back", I will advice you to check the source I have added to it. It says "For the financial year 2008-09, while the Mumbai airport recorded 23.6 million passenger footfalls, the Delhi airport recorded 22.84 million". There are lots admin/sr editors watching this(IGI) article, Still no body removed the sentence you removed. simply because, Whatever I have added is backed by quality reference. So removing claims backed with quality source is called Vandalism. Reason is, its deliberate act. KuwarOnline Talk 04:27, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help with "The Dolmen" article[edit]

Thank you so very much for your help in brushing up and improving the reference pages/links in my first article on the Weymouth band, The Dolmen. There is quite a bit to learn regarding proper posting of articles within Wikipedia, and I am so grateful for pointers and assitance as I make my through the labyrinth. Regards, Ceitidh (talk) 18:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome my friend, If you want to learn about writing proper article here is great way to start see Wikipedia:Article wizard. KuwarOnline Talk 05:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination for deletion of Template:Indian expressways

Template:Indian expressways has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979  08:47, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi KuwarOnline, Is is ok to add Shopping mall lists to metropolis articles. --Onef9day Talk! 10:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Onef9day, Yes you can added, no harm if u add in see also section e.g. Delhi or any specific section like shopping e.g Gurgaon. KuwarOnline Talk 11:49, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
hi, thanks for reply. I checked delhi article and got the idea how the list has been made. thanks for quick reply. cheers! --Onef9day Talk! 05:12, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Durgapur Xpressway[edit]

Hello, KuwarOnline. You have new messages at Fastily's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-FASTILY (TALK) 17:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need Help With Citation[edit]

Hi, I want to know how to fix citation in cite book. i find it difficult to do it. Please check this for citations 23 and 24. tell how to used single citation more than once. --Onef9day Talk! 13:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hmm there is very simple way to do it. just visit following link citfixes and add your article name there. click run reflink wait for while till toolserver do the job for you after some time go to end of the page and follow. KuwarOnline Talk 14:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! i'll try this tool. Thanks again. cheers! --Onef9day Talk! 14:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]