Jump to content

User talk:Julianpratt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for editing Wikipedia! Need help?[edit]

Hello Julianpratt, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! I want to invite you to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. I hope you see you there! heather walls (talk) 03:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stewardship economy[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

EllenCT (talk) 06:42, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Stewardship economy#Advantages of a stewardship economy over an ownership economy section needs references and needs to be converted from bullets to WP:PROSE.

I gather that you have sources appropriate for that section in "The Why? Supplement" -- is there a URL for that? EllenCT (talk) 12:03, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stewardship economy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stewardship economy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewardship economy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. --nonsense ferret 14:33, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Julianpratt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Moxy (talk) 22:31, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  • The blue bar below is a navigation template. Click "show" on the right to view an outline of Wikipedia's help pages. This template can be found at the bottom of most related pages.

Thanks for your message; moved deleted advantages section to article talk page[edit]

Dear Dr. Pratt, thank you for your message on my talk page. And your very kind words! I am fairly new here too, but I have a independent study lab advisor who is looking over my electronic shoulder and knows all the ins and outs of Wikipedia. On his advice, I moved the unsourced "Advantages" section that someone deleted to the article's talk page at Talk:Stewardship economy#Deleted advantages section. When you add your supplement's sources and convert it to prose over the weekend, you can do it there, and then copy it back into the article when you're done, and see what happens. I will try to keep an eye on it and brush things up so don't worry too much about formatting. EllenCT (talk) 01:39, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion[edit]

I talked to my advisor about the situation. Neither of us are very happy about some of the edits which people have made while the deletion discussion is ongoing. What I am going to do is put a copy of the original article in your WP:USERSPACE here: User:Julianpratt/Stewardship Economy

What you can do is change the article so that it's specifically about the book. However, it's uncertain whether a re-created article will be seen in a favorable light, so please have a look at WP:BK and try to do whatever you can to get independent reviews, e.g. send copies of the book with the reviews you already have to everyone who might possibly be interested in the topic and beg them to publish a review.

More later. EllenCT (talk) 16:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]