Jump to content

User talk:GeminiSyxx

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Cochran (April 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, GeminiSyxx! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Cochran (musician) (April 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit.

The infobox is malformed.

Articles other than list articles should not consist primarily of very long lists. See Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. The discography is too long.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 21:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Cochran (musician) (April 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please add inline references so that readers can clearly identify where the statements are sourced from. Without these, it is almost impossible for readers to check that the statements are factual.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, GeminiSyxx! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Jack90s15 (talk) 20:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Cochran (musician) (May 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
From a notability standpoint, I think Cochran meets the "is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles" criteria of WP:MUSICBIO. That being the case the main issue with this draft is the amount of unsourced material. This either needs to be stripped out or appropriate sources found for it and inline citations added.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:46, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FICTION SYXX (May 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Do not cite discogs, rateyourmusic, or non-notable blog sites.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Cochran (musician) (May 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Too much unsourced content, where has it come from?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Draft:FICTION SYXX[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:FICTION SYXX, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.melodicrock.com/tags/fiction-syxx, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:FICTION SYXX saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Missvain (talk) 18:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Cochran (musician) (October 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RoySmith were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please list here, the WP:THREE best sources to show the subject meets WP:MUSICIAN. My spot checking of the references shows mostly passing mentions and the like. Kiss collaborator Cochrane suffers stroke doesn't appear to be a WP:RS; most of it is quotes from a facebook page. The obvious misspelling the the first sentence doesn't give me much confidence that there's any editorial oversight at all.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 15:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Karl Cochran (musician) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Karl Cochran (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Karl Cochran (musician)[edit]

Hello, GeminiSyxx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Karl Cochran".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:55, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this link

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Cochran - Rock Musician (January 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Chicdat was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Promotional, promotional, promotional. If you want this to become an article, then you seriously need to fix everything. Any questions? Just bawk to me.
🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:KarlCochran.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:KarlCochran.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Karl Cochran (musician)[edit]

Hello, GeminiSyxx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Karl Cochran".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Cullen328 (talk) 16:33, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|My apologies. I was moving pages around and lost site of the draft vs article along with submission button. I was following the errors that showed up at that top and removed the link references that were detected. I was open to others reviewing my entry. But the button was gone, when I used the move function. Where do I go from here? I actually messed up my user account. It had been a while since i was last on here. I truly apologize. I was not meaning to be marked as SPAM. I believe it was due to a move function, instead of a draft and ask for review. It was an error on my part, after reading an article about a renaming of a page via a move. I now understand what that means. The pages are now drafts and I cannot edit to submit for review, because I am blocked form doing so. I believe I used a term raising profile. I meant creating and publishing a profile. twist on terms. }

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GeminiSyxx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

I was not spamming. I was trying to figure out a new function based on an article and the protocol led to my being blocked. I am now aware of what occurred. Nothing that I entered was erroneous and I removed all mentions of blocked sites per the informational warnings by Wiki . Thank you. GeminiSyxx (talk) 18:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please; you made two simultaneous requests. This isn't a matter of links, this is a matter of WP:COI and WP:PROMO (and, well, WP:USERNAME). Yamla (talk) 22:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To the admin reviewing the unblock request: GeminiSyxx contacted me by WP:EMAIL shortly after their unblock request, to the effect that they are a friend of the subject of the article, and they are, to paraphrase, attempting to raise the subject's profile. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Cochran (musician) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Karl Cochran (musician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced (such as your recollections, or your conversations with his family members) should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Allen Lanoue moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Mark Allen Lanoue, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Per the email you sent me today, you never intended to move it from draft into mainspace and did so by mistake when trying to rename it. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your email[edit]

I received your email. Unless I have made an obvious error, I do not unblock accounts that I have blocked. I leave that to other administrators. As for your draft on Karl Cochran, vast swaths of it are unreferenced and some of the references that are there are clearly unreliable. We do not publish an article because somebody had stroke. We publish an article when the topic is clearly notable, and when the draft is well-referenced. So, if you are unblocked, take those requirements seriously. Please read Your first article and follow the advice that you will find there. Cullen328 (talk) 00:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fiction Syxx for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fiction Syxx is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiction Syxx until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pichpich (talk) 21:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mark Allen Lanoue[edit]

Information icon Hello, GeminiSyxx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Allen Lanoue, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mark Allen Lanoue[edit]

Hello, GeminiSyxx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mark Allen Lanoue".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:17, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GeminiSyxx&oldid=1139679531"