User talk:Dddcg

Dddcg, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Dddcg! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of WorldCreaterFighter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 15:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dddcg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was originally a new user without any account using the IP 1.247.135.183. When I edited some articles, people left talk to me, they must be suspecting me a random guy trying to vandal. I created this account for the first time and after using an account, people didn't left talk to me. I am a newbie so I don't know much about here. If you see my history, there will be many minor changed because I am clumsy here yet. Most of all, My English is poor you can easily notice that. I was very surprised at this absurd accusement. Please show me the evidence of IP log. Is this even possible without an evidence? I know about the Sock puppetry incident on the Paleosiberian languages article. Korean was originally listed in the list but somehow Korean was removed. It must be a valdalims from an Altaic language supporter and I am not one of them. Therefore I reverted it. Secondly, I didn't try to relate Goguryeo and Khitan. The article clearly says it's merely loanword. I am not very much fond of here so even if I am suspended, it's nothing special to me but I want to ask this for last time. SHOW THE CONCRETE EVIDENCE. I am 100% sure you can't show a single evidence as I am first and newbie here. Possibly logged in country of him and I would be different. I never expected I end up like this. Anyway, good bye. you cocky guys.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:35, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dddcg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for

1. I am accused for being the same user who was previously blocked

== WorldCreaterFighter == : WorldCreaterFighter (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log))
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WorldCreaterFighter/Archive.

2. I am not the user who was previously blocked. So I request to unblock me, and I request investigation on this absurd accusement and request punishment on the person who accused me for false charge. I am very unpleasant for this accusement. Thank you. The word "cocky" was not towards you.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, as below you indicate that you no longer wish to be unblocked. Your edits cannot be removed, once you make an edit, you agree that it may be used by Wikipedia in any manner(the disclaimer that appears with every edit window) If you change your mind about wanting to be unblocked, you may make another request. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, your IP address is pretty different than the last sock puppet of WorldCreatorFighter that I blocked, I'll give you that. However, you seem to be making pretty similar edits. If you could explain that, it would probably help. You can see the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WorldCreaterFighter. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:38, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So you are already acknowledging that my IP range is different. So you are like this Oh look at him he looks like the bastard before. What? His IP is different? So what? I don't give a damn about such thing. I don't like his style anyway. Kick him out of here Well well, I first have to mention this, this place is not like what I thought. You have no hesitation to alienate someone without conviction. I don't know what he (the blocked guy before me) has done here. I don't know what has led you to dispise him. I'm not even interested in him and his history, just like you have no interest about my breakfast. 3 months ago a famous Youtuber Langfocus uploaded a video about the Korean language. Visit counts on the article Korean language here would have risen temporarily for sure. I am one of them and I found so many wrong info. Many people interested in Korean but don't speak the language have a speculative belief that Korean and Japanese languages are related but they deny it because they hate each other. Of course it is not true. His video was not an exception and many were cited from here. That's the reason I began to edit here dispite my poor English. Probably the blocked guy before me would have been one of them, led by the video. You asked me why I am making similar edits. I don't know is there any something wrong? Vovin is one of the most famous linguists about these languages publicing lots of paper. Is there any reason that I should not cite his reference? To be honest, I'm done here. Please revert all the history I have done here. Sorry that I disturbed you.