User talk:C.Fred

Welcome to my talk page.

Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.
Please add a new thread to the bottom of the page if you wish to leave me a new message. If you're following up on a previous message, keep your comment in that same place:
- If you leave me a message here, I will reply here and {{Mention}} you here or leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page, unless you indicate that you are watching my page or no talkback message is necessary.
- If you are responding to a message I left on your talk page, please reply there so the discussion stays in one place. Please {{Mention}} me in the message there or leave a {{Talkback}} template here so I know about the message, unless I indicate that no talkback is necessary in my message. If you are commenting here on a message or warning I left there, don't be surprised if I move the discussion back to your talk page.
This page is set for automatic archiving every 7 days. I will remove talkback messages as acknowledgment that I have read the related reply, and I reserve the right to summarily remove any uncivil comments or frivolous warnings.

Thank you, and happy editing!

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

CIR for copyvio and caption[edit]

I think KnowledgeHunter6788 has demonstrated a lack of competency in their blowing way past 3RR to restore a copyright violation and non-English caption. Is a block warranted? ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti I'm taking a look at the St. Aloysius University situation right now. That plus the image is...I'm not sure if I want to call it CIR or disruptive, but it's a net negative to the project. —C.Fred (talk) 18:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti This edit says more than I can say. —C.Fred (talk) 19:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frustrating. Thanks for offering your help. I can file a report if you'd like. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti Eh, even without Google Translate rendering it, they crossed a line. —C.Fred (talk) 20:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irfan Ajvazi[edit]

Hello, C.Fred,

Guess what article got moved back to main space? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Guess what just got a G4 tag back. As I told the creator, if he declines my offer of help, then it's on with deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 13:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

C.Fred - Vandalism help[edit]

I would ask for you to please objectively look at "Toa Noadhiki05's" "reliably sourced content" which he refuses to defend other than saying it applies. I have provided numerous direct reliable sources from the Blue Dog Platform. This person has an opinion as many people do and is sitting on this article insisting it is fact using the opinions of others. It should be changed to "Center". I can provide all my sources and evidence in detail as to why "Center-Left" does not apply to this grouping. Thank you. Minnesotawaterballer (talk) 23:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Minnesotawaterballer What do you mean by "direct" reliable sources? As a general rule, we go by what third parties say about groups, not what groups say about themselves. —C.Fred (talk) 23:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I provided evidence of what other third party groups say about them as well. How can I further get consensus? Minnesotawaterballer (talk) 23:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Minnesotawaterballer Let's see how the discussion proceeds. —C.Fred (talk) 02:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Palm Springs Air Museum[edit]

{{Talkback|user1|section|ts = 5/28/24}} I posted a reply to you on the Talk page for Palm Springs Air Museum on May 24 and have received no response. It appears no one is weighing in from your request for other opinions. I also have seen no response from @Drmies. Please advise what steps I need to take. Thank you. @BellamyBell BellamyBell (talk) 01:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea because you didn't ping me. Drmies (talk) 02:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request[edit]

hello, @C.Fred sir. Please add my edit request to Yadav and Ahir article. In the 1881 census records of the British Empire it is stated that the Yadavs, who in their turn are identified with the Gaulis (Gwalas) and Ahirs, were the dominant race at that time.[1] Hcsrctu (talk) 02:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hcsrctu I don't see a request at Talk:Ahir, nor is it clear exactly what you're suggesting should be inserted. I don't see you active at Talk:Yadav in the last few weeks at all. —C.Fred (talk) 02:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can add this[2] edit request to Ahir article. Thanks. Hcsrctu (talk) 03:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hcsrctu Do you need assistance in making a request? I don't see a clear request of what you think should be changed. Further, I'm not inclined to change the article based on the source mentioned in that discussion without discussion by editors with more subject familiarity and a consensus among them to proceed. —C.Fred (talk) 03:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the [3]discussion, as per the discussion, it was proposed to merge the content of the Ahirs as Yadavs into the Ahir article but Ahirs as Yadavs was merged by an editor without adding content to the Ahir article. I request you to please add the content of Ahirs as Yadavs article to Ahir article. Thanks. Hcsrctu (talk) 03:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hcsrctu That's a completely different request from what you indicated before. Please sort out what you're trying to accomplish before making a request; I don't want to keep guessing what it is you're trying to do. —C.Fred (talk) 03:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred, Actually Ahir and Yadav are two names of the same community, but both these words have been misinterpreted in these articles. The article has misrepresented the relationship between Ahir and Yadav and that Ahirs adopted the name Yadav in the 19th century, This is completely wrong because in the British census of 1881, Yadavs were clearly identified with Ahirs. So how can Ahirs adopted the Yadav name in the 19th century? Therefore, I want that section ==Ahirs as Yadavas== should be added in this Ahir article. Thanks. Hcsrctu (talk) 09:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred You can pick up Ahirs as Yadavs contents from here [4]. Thanks. Hcsrctu (talk) 10:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]