User talk:Bookku/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Your comments at AE

Your comments at AE here is making the admins think that they have a lot to read. I think if you collapse all the text you added there, the admins will read and close that AE with or without action, faster (since everything you have typed is just friendly advise). I don't mean to offend you but I strongly believe that what I have typed here is in good faith!-Haani40 (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

@Haani40

Uninvolved users play an important role in by providing assessment and different and likely more neutral perspective to save admin time. My analysis in comments is policy wise quite relevant, I regret if other users are ignoring it.

I find it very strange you to presume some thing on admin behalf without providing dif of any such specific discussion by any admin. You know most part of my comment was already collapsed. Still in good faith I collapsed one more para after your request. Before reaching to misleading presumption you should have communicated with the admin and requested to close the case. Any ways I made the request to the admin. I wish and strongly suggest henceforth not to repeat presumption on somebody else's behalf. Bookku (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

OK, thanks for doing so!-Haani40 (talk) 17:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

This turned out to be sock saga. For my own record before archival. Bookku (talk) 14:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Wikiproject invitation

Hello, Bookku! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women's Premier League (cricket), an collaborative group which aims to support development of Women's Premier League related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. We trust you, Bookku/Archive 5, and we know that you have a lot of interest in this area. So why wait? Join fast by signing your name here! Thanks, and happy editing! You can also invite others by placing {{subst:User:Vestrian24Bio/Wikiproject Women's Premier League (cricket)/Invitation}} in their talk page. This Wikiproject is still in the Proposal state; for it to be created a minimum number of participants needs to sign-up, I personally think you'd be interested in participating and left you this invite. Your participation is appreciated.

Vestrian24Bio (U, T, A, C, S) 08:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Pl help me find if possible

Can someone pl. help in finding previous discussions, similar to the case discussed in Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard#Notable scholar's own work acceptable or OR? section , from archives of WP:NORN notice board or any other discussion, if possible?

Request made on own talk page since helpme template is strangely not allowed in Wikipedia namespace though at times help can be helpful at noticeboards too in multiple ways. Bookku (talk) 00:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes, it's intentional that the {{help}} templates be used on your own user talk page.

No, you may not ask for subject matter help using them. And, at its base, that seems to be what you are trying to get. What you have is a completely normal discussion about content and it's being handled in the normal way, on a noticeboard or talk page. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

@Jmcgnh I can understand you seem to be providing only 'how to' help. Though I suppose Wikipedia needs data mining support to study similar previous discussions since users discussing issues may have other time constraints.

Any ways is it essential for me to retain replaced template or I can remove the same since I have taken note of it? Bookku (talk) 02:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

You will find data mining with such vague questions to be hard to automate; as it is, people seem to be having a hard time figuring out what the topic of that discussion is, much less how some older discussion might be similar to it in some way.

You are free to edit your user page as you see fit, including removing (or archiving) sections for which you don't expect there to be followups. In fact, just about the only thing you are forbidden to remove are declined unblock notices. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

• Providing support and help needs positive mind to understand difficulties without labeling, patience and perseverance; I am also in a role of providing help as discussion facilitator at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard#Notable scholar's own work acceptable or OR?. Support and solutions are needed where things are complex, but any ways presently no Support and solutions around so no choice other than accepting no choice Bookku (talk) 04:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)