User talk:Adakiko

4

WikiDefcon 4: 3.23 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot

Removing outdated and irrelevant info from article - how to source?

Hi there Adakiko, thanks for the message on my page. I am unsure how to proceed as the edit I made on Noah's Ark Zoo Farm included removing the "owner: Anthony Bush" from the info box. The article itself includes sources for why this is the case (i.e. the zoo is now a charity and therefore not owned). Similarly, I removed information which was irrelevant to the article. How should I go about including a source for information I have removed? Thank you! Emmybris (talk) 09:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

@Emmybris: is there a wp:secondary source that states they are a charity? What the zoo publishes could be self-serving; especially given the 2009-2010 circumstances. Agree with your assessment of the second paragraph. I removed it. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

I will try to find a source for that - if I do, where do I put the reference when removing the ownership section from the infobox? Thanks Emmybris (talk) 14:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

@Emmybris: I removed Bush as the owner. It would be nice to have an unbiased secondary source. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 00:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Cahouët Affair

"Cahouët Affair" is still an event (dumb example: "French Revolution"), rather than a proper name (dumb example: "John Smith"), and an article is therefore required. You might be probably right in disagreeing with the use of the French article; does "The Affaire Cahouët (or Cahouët Affair) was an incident..." version work better for you? 82.63.89.206 (talk) 01:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Please create an article: wp:articles for creation. Or request one: wp:Requested articles. You can also start a discussion on talk:Cahouët Affair about your concern: help:talk pages. Adding that edit summary to Cahouët Affair probably won't get an article written. Thank you for your message. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 02:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Was referring to this. 82.63.89.206 (talk) 02:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Were you trying to change the wording to L'affaire Cahouët as in fr:Affaire Cahouët? It would have helped if you said so or asked how to do that. Adakiko (talk) 08:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Yup, I was. It seemed obvious to me; I thought only later that this is the english site.

Well, no big deal; the disagreement got resolved. 82.63.89.206 (talk) 12:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. Cheers! Adakiko (talk) 18:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Removed content from Eye Color

Hi, I removed the section about amber eye color being more common in those regions because the source which was after the claim was irrelevant to the claim being made. In other words, the source made no mention of those regions listed having higher percentges of amber eyes. Seemed to me an odd claim to make without a source, so I removed it. Tommygunn7886 (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

An LLM's Perspective on Understanding

Please say why you keep deleting my contribution. "No Original Research" ??

Readers of the Chinese Room entries should be interested in what an LLM has to say about the topic. I have cited research that supports its perspective. What else do you want? 184.146.58.138 (talk) 16:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

You stated in Chinese Room: For these reasons, I challenge Searle's insistence that true understanding requires something more than following rules and producing outputs.. That is worded as if your personal assessment; if so, that is "original research". If it is a quote from the article, please enclose it in double ticks and include a citation to the source. Also, a LLM chatbot is not a wp:reliable source. The LLM's assessment might be interesting, but it is off-topic and should not be added. You could discuss this on talk:Chinese Room - see help:talk pages and wp:talk page guidelines. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 17:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding konkani langauge edit

There added all the script where the Konkani people reside but konkani sahitya parishad of Kerala and Karnataka use devanagari as official.So usage of other script is far from reality RobertJudeson (talk) 06:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

What i meant is if someone is writing Germany in Hebrew script,it’s his personal option but regulatory body’s opinion becomes final.Here regulator body is sahitya parishad. RobertJudeson (talk) 06:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

@Adakiko

Mentioning this in article with citation makes sense but here citation is not there but lede should have strong citation.Hope I am conveying my stance. RobertJudeson (talk) 12:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

@RobertJudeson: If one person writes German in Hebrew script that is one thing. If a significant number do and it is documented and cited, it belongs on Wikipedia. Whether or not it is "official" is irrelevant to its inclusion on Wikipedia.

Edit on the National Petition to the Blue House page

Hey @Adakiko,

00101984hjw here, sorry for not explaining my edit on the National Petition to the Blue House page. The article was previously in a bad state, with most of its material poorly translated, most likely machine-translated, from its corresponding page on the Korean wikipedia. I decided to reformat the entire <Answers> section which included a lot of WP:TOOMUCH material. 00101984hjw (talk) 02:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Okay sorry

Im sorry adakiko i really am. ❤️ sending you a sorry heart i love you. 2601:840:467F:D370:BDB8:A563:9696:BC1A (talk) 02:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

What did I do wrong?

Bud you cant blame me im sorry i said im a girl but i am so what should you do better? 2601:840:467F:D370:BDB8:A563:9696:BC1A (talk) 02:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

We are here to wp:Build an encyclopedia. Chatting is fun, but that's not what Wikipedia pages, including people's talk pages are for. Adakiko (talk) 02:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

AIV reports

Please only use AIV for obvious vandalism and spam. For example, edit warring should be reported to WP:ANEW. There is a list of noticeboards specific to various issues linked at the top of WP:RAA. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)