User:Otheus/lady

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

the lady doth protest too much[edit]

I've seen the phrase several times from different users. I'd like to compile a histogram to see if I can find any SSP's.

Evidence[edit]

User name
User:The_lady_doth_protest_too_much,_methinks
Sockpuppet of Cplot. indefinitely blocked
User
Ram-man
Ram-Man 22:21, Aug 13, 2003 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits/Archive_1
Article
Milhouse_of_Sand_and_Fog
Homer quotes Hamlet.
Article
Phrases_from_Hamlet_in_common_English
Quotes Hamlet
User
Viajero 12:28, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Lst27.09
User
Thanatosimii 21:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nil_Einne
User
John Smith's 19:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
his own talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:John_Smith's
User
Monicasdude 00:44, 30 April 2006


User
Hipocrite - «Talk» 22:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
RfC on Hipocrite: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Hipocrite
User
Bwithh 20:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
History21 doth protest too much, methinks. Zoe and Hipocrite should be commended for their vigilance
So Bwithh could be Hipocrite. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Hipocrite
User
ScienceApologist 18:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ScienceApologist/Archive_4 I think that the lady doth protest too much. The contextual evidence is very strong. You live in the same general geographic location as Christopher Michael Langan, you defend him with a personal zeal unlike any I've seen, and you hold his ideas true and dear. When another user made fun of Langan's high IQ you went ballistic. Yep, I think most people can come to their own conclusions. --ScienceApologist 18:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
User
WillC 20:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive127
THE LADIES DOTH PROTEST TOO MUCH!WillC 20:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
User
Eleemosynary 02:31, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
But this BD777 case is a special case indeed, soon to draw (one hopes) to a just and fair conclusion. Eleemosynary 02:31, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Eleemosynary


Analysis[edit]

There are simply too many single instances from different users. I'm off my rocker. Apparently everyone but me remembers sheakspear. Or whatever his name is.