Jump to content

User:Majorly/ACE2009

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page exists to give explanations for the votes I make, and my thoughts about the candidate. Unlike some people who dismiss good faith questions to their opposition as "badgering", I am happy to answer questions about my voting or comments, and am willing to be persuaded to change my mind. If you require further explanation for votes or comments, please ask me.

Username Statement Questions Thoughts Vote
AGK (talk · contribs) Statement Questions Had some issues regarding power seeking across various wiki projects. Seemed to grow up overnight, and nowadays seems quite sensible. Disagree with stance on Jake Wartenberg's questions. I like your targets idea. Dislike answer to Q9 from Rschen7754.
Cla68 (talk · contribs) Statement Questions
Coren (talk · contribs) Statement Questions Q9 is problematic - fate of functionaries should not reside with arbcom. Q27, 28 are too - for reasons that should be obvious (ask if not). Q32 - MBisanz was rightly not appointed. Arbcom should not be making such decisions. Q35 - very concerned you don't remember the username... Individual qs: Q9 (from Rschen7754) - eek! I also noted you have proposed banning somebody for three months on the mailing list case - an entirely useless idea, in my opinion. Short bans achieve nothing but political satisfaction for a while. Then the user comes back... you do seem to care more than some candidates, which is a good point.
Fred Bauder (talk · contribs) Statement Questions Not suited. He's had his time.
Fritzpoll (talk · contribs) Statement Questions I recall this user had something to do with mass creation of stubs, which I think is a dreadful idea.
Hersfold (talk · contribs) Statement Questions Another arbcom clerk...
Jehochman (talk · contribs) Statement Questions You don't seem to have changed from last year... too much involvement in drama stuff.
Kirill Lokshin (talk · contribs) Statement Questions Your role in this fiasco is unacceptable. You've had your time. This <redacted external link> also makes interesting reading]. Not sure why people are strongly supporting...
Kmweber (talk · contribs) Statement Questions Unfortunately, with controversy after scandal on ArbCom, I'm sort of wanting to support abolishing ArbCom.
KnightLago (talk · contribs) Statement Questions An arbcom clerk, which is a negative for me.
Mailer diablo (talk · contribs) Statement Questions An extremely sensible user. I suggested you run two years ago, if I recall correctly.
MBK004 (talk · contribs) Statement Questions Not familiar.
RMHED (talk · contribs) Statement Questions Was unbanned without community consent by Arbcom, and clearly should still be banned.
Ruslik0 (talk · contribs) Statement Questions Not familiar.
Secret (talk · contribs) Statement Questions Multiple RfAs, powerseeking across different projects, dodgy history, multiple usernames, only an admin through backdoor request to sympathetic bureaucrat.
Seddon (talk · contribs) Statement Questions The only candidate I have met in person.
Shell Kinney (talk · contribs) Statement Questions A perennial candidate? Just doesn't strike me as somebody who would make a difference.
SirFozzie (talk · contribs) Statement Questions
Steve Smith (talk · contribs) Statement Questions
Unomi (talk · contribs) Statement Questions Not familiar.
Wehwalt (talk · contribs) Statement Questions
William M. Connolley (talk · contribs) Statement Questions A controversial editor, recently desysopped.
Xavexgoem (talk · contribs) Statement Questions Not familiar.