Template talk:MultiLicenseCommunism

TfD debate[edit]

This template survived a debate at TfD. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 January 28 for details. -Splash^talk 23:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This tag was listed at WP:CP on January 29. Whatever is wrong with it, it is certainly not itself a violation of copyright, so I'm removing it from the list without deleting it. As for concerns about its compatibility with GFDL, I'd point out that copyright notices like this are only binding if they invoke a status recognized under copyright law; this template has no effect at all on the copyright status of the contributions of someone who has it on their user page. Chick Bowen 03:38, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seem to see[edit]

"Use it as you see fit."

You see grammar is very important to the [...] party

2600:6C4E:1200:1E85:6901:4008:ED77:34AB (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]