Talk:Wilson Combat

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 September 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

External links[edit]

An editor keeps placing links to various Wilson Combat promotion sites, such as twitter, facebook, as well as their store site. These sites don't meet wikipedia external link policy and should not be in the article. If you have questions about it, please ask. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 20:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1911[edit]

I suggest rewording the first sentence. It reads a bit like it was a store that existed in 1911. I'm not quite sure how to rewrite it, as I know little about gunsmithing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:26, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's better now - let me know if it doesn't make sense. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 21:39, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I should be able to get some information together for a decent article by Friday/Saturday. Should perhaps have some pictures too. I might even have a Wilson Combat 1911 lying around here somewhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeusImperator (talk • contribs) 01:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good job with the 1911 rephrase. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok we are going to have a decent article soon. With a few pics.DeusImperator (talk) 15:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nick, the Technical Advisor at WC should be able to help us out on this one. But we'd have to wait until about Friday. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeusImperator (talk • contribs) 14:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't heard from Nick for awhile now.DeusImperator (talk) 16:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]