Talk:Operation Mosaic/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 05:52, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
A few comments from me:
- the lead could do with expansion to properly summarise the article
- in the lead, the statement about the claim doesn't really reflect what occurred. Would it be better to flesh it out a bit more and state that the claim remains unsubstantiated?
- not sure how Operation Hurricane fell short on the "independence" count? Surely it meant that the UK had an independent nuclear strike capability?
- "produced release neutrons" Is a release neutron a thing, or is this a typo?
- "and one with a tamper to investigate its effect" what sort of tamper?
- why was Emu Field considered unsuitable for these tests?
- mention that Hurricane had been at Monte Bello? And explain why they were chosen?
- But wasn't Hurricane a 25 KT yield? Why did the British understate the yield? Is this known?
- I assume Atomic Weapons Tests Safety Committee was Australian? Perhaps clarify this?
- frigate is duplinked
- What was the purpose of TG 308.3?
- link Westland Whirlwind (helicopter)
- say where the Parting Pool was
- what were the suitable weather conditions required for G2? They obviously differed from G1
- what 15 July deadline?
- was Smith ever interviewed about her claims in the book? What did the Royal Commission say?
- is there any explanation as to why the clouds rose so much higher than expected in both tests?
- "unexpectedly high yield or because the arithmetical values of the parameters used in the computations did not completely fit the conditions of firing". The Royal Commission says: "either way, somebody got it wrong". 12:59, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- is there a benchmark that can be applied to the REM dose? In terms of what is normal or what is likely to result in detrimental effects?
- link Radioactive decay
- in the summary table, the Notes column is a bit inconsistent, Boosted fission weapon vs Boosted design, and no tamper mentioned for G1
- Boyes needs a location
- File:HMAS Warrego by Allan Green SLV H91.325 78.jpeg needs a US PD tag
- as does File:HMAS Junee by Allan Green SLV H91.108 2689.jpeg
- the US PD tag for File:HMAS Karangi.jpg needs a date of publication
That's me done, placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Nice work! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)