Talk:Miliolana

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Taxobox taxonomy[edit]

Having Domain Eucaryota at the top seems an unnecessary extra, unless you think Domain should be included in all taxoboxes. Starting with Kingdom (or even some lower taxon) seems sufficient enough. I suppose the rank given Foraminifera isn't all that important as they've been ranked anywhere from order (Foramiiferida) to phylum. As for kingdom, take your pick of, yes, Protista, or the alternative Protoctista, or either Protozoa or Chromista depending on what reference grabs your fancy. And there are plenty to choose from. However, Rhizaria is an infrakingdom, with Retaria a lower rank. The kingdom, if that's your pick is Rhizareae J.H.McDonnell (talk) 18:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@J.H.McDonnell:This is a general encyclopedia, so the domain is important for the general readership, and the taxobox technical functionality uses the domain to categorize and color the boxes, so it is a requirement for the box. As for Forams, using the rank that the foram article itself uses, and making sure its a current peer reviewed source (not old sources from the 1990 or earlier).--Kev min § 16:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]