Talk:Maslama al-Majriti
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Editors notes 19.10.2013[edit]
- The original text incorrectly includes both works in Latin translation as the Picatrix, which only refers to the second.
- In addition, it is grossly tautological and imbalanced between the two.
- Furthermore, a warning is missing that the Latin text is somewhat edited to remove references contrary to Christian dogma.
- The inconsistency in dating is probably a post-mortem edition of the author's works, a common practice when books were written by hand and an author may spend many years editing and revising his text.
- The editor is a member of the Warburg Institute's Esoterics Study Group, part of London University's Advanced Studies School, and is working at post-doctoral level.
Translations[edit]
It was a work done by the Felmish Rudolph from Brudges of the Toledo school (16th century). But it is not clear whether they were written by Maslama al-Majriti or his prudo-version. Rudolph wrote on astrolabe of Astrological-alchemical knowledge (source: The scientific dialogue linking America, Asia and Europe between the 12th and the 20thCentury, p. 437). Regards, Theologian81sp
Stop berberized everthing[edit]
He is not berber what soucre said that 41.141.136.35 (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)