Talk:List of Fuller House episodes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Splitting proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I propose that each season be split into articles themselves that are titled "Fuller House (Season #)." This page should be kept, but removing individual episode summaries. Per WP:CONSISTENCY and general similarity between the similar TV Shows articles, the Page should be split up. You can view how it was split on Full House articles here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. -- mrwoogi010  Talk 01:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If any split were to occur, it would be to Fuller House (season 1), Fuller House (season 2), Fuller House (season 3), Fuller House (season 4) - uncapitalized seasons, per WP:NCTV. And just because other pages exist, does not mean that they would suit this article. Season articles should consist of more than just a episode table and infobox - it should contain cast and characters, background and production (in the form of development, casting, filming, music, etc.), released information, reception (critical reception, accolades, ratings), home media, etc., at the least. Season articles do not exist simply for "removing individual episode summaries" (which is not what occurs at all; in fact, the table is actually transcluded and thus the table does not end up residing on this article at all). If you believe that this content exists for each of these seasons, it is best to start the articles off in the draftspace: Draft:Fuller House (season 1), Draft:Fuller House (season 2), Draft:Fuller House (season 3), Draft:Fuller House (season 4), and then move them to the mainspace. All the best! -- AlexTW 02:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I fully agree with this idea and would happy to help with the move if need be. It's a great idea, much needed, and there's certainly enough reason and content to make the move. --Jonathan Joseph (talk) 04:29, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you wouldn't mind don't that, it would be a great improvement to the topic. Let me know if I can do anything to help. Thank you! -- mrwoogi010  Talk 16:18, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, as long as there enough independent information to exist in the article (similar to what AlexTheWhovian said). TheDoctorWho (talk) 19:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.