A fact from Jun ware appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 November 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that flowerpots for the Ming emperors were made in official Jun ware?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
I will try to make something of this site. The original author made statements at odds with my own reading of Japanese and Chinese scholarship. Iwanafish.
There are too many images in this article, the captions are also not done properly. There should be no more than one or two images per item that needs to be illustrated. Anyone curious to see more can go to the Commons. Gryffindor (talk) 09:44, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree at all re the number, and you have edited the captions to your satisfaction. Johnbod (talk) 13:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You are overloading the article with images of the same type. This is in conflict with WP:IG. Gryffindor (talk) 12:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No it isn't. Read it. And you were specifically asked not to replace the images with dodgy retouched versions, but you have. I'll accept the one that had the string, but the others should go. Really, can't you find something useful to do? This stalking is just wasting everybody's time. As I'm sure you are aware, this article has been submitted to DYK so I will remove the pointy tag again, and restore the pic version used in the DYK nom, which should be used. Johnbod (talk) 10:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]