Talk:How the Irish Saved Civilization

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	An image is requested for this article as its inclusion will substantially increase the significance of the article. Please remove the `image-needed` parameter once the image is added.

Celts

	How the Irish Saved Civilization is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

My contribution to this article may have had some flaws but I do not think you improved it. In my opinion it would have been an improvement if you had modified the main imperfections and/or added some counterarguments in favour of the book. As far as I can see, my article does not read like an essay but like an extremely well-researched and well-referenced review about a bad book. The original article was a stub, and there was a request by wikipedia to help improve it by expanding it. Moreover, Wikipedia is on the lookout for new authors and asks them "to be bold". If this is what happens to new authors on en.wikipedia, it is small wonder that there is a shortage of them. I have published stuff on de.wikipedia without any problems. Please show some respect for my work, which was extremely time-consuming. Alienllama (talk) 18:39, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it might be up to others to decide whether your contributions are "extremely well-researched and well-referenced". However, original research is not acceptable. It is good that you are bold, but please note that Wikipedia:Be bold says "Don't get upset if your bold edits get deleted." In any case, I stand by my initial assertion that amazon reviews are inappropriate. I'm sorry your initial experience has been frustrating, but I should point out that some of the material you added has been retained in the article. St Anselm (talk) 04:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So how did they save what civilization[edit]

Could someone add one or two sentences on how civilization was saved by the Irish. The claim seems absurd - and the text as of now only repeats that they did it ... it's even unclear what is meant with 'civilization'.-Thomas (talk) 09:17, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]