Talk:History of Christchurch

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 May 2024 by reviewer MicrobiologyMarcus (talk · contribs).

New Zealand: Māori High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Māori task force (assessed as High-importance).

History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Text and/or other creative content from Christchurch was copied or moved into History of Christchurch, New Zealand on 2 May 2024. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

The content in this article was moved from Christchurch[edit]

For any future travellers, the content of this article was taken from the article for the city of Christchurch. The history section was around 35% of the total article and consensus was reached that this was too much. We decided to split it out to a dedicated article, and this is that. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 07:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Launchballer talk 22:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the New Zealand city of Christchurch was built on a swamp?

Source: Rice, Geoffrey (2008). Christchurch Changing: An Illustrated History (2nd ed.). Christchurch: Canterbury University Press. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-908812-53-0. This was to become Christchurch, and though the Pilgrims of 1850 grumbled about its swampiness, the site was an obvious compromise...

Reviewed:

Created by Cloventt (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 07:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Withdrawn as the content isn't new enough. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 18:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn’t a good idea. It’s not new content and as such, it’s not eligible. You should withdraw the nomination by stating that on the nom page. Schwede 66 13:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. I thought it might qualify as a new article. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 19:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:DYKNEW. Schwede 66 23:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]