Talk:Great Fire of London/Archive 2

Use of "The section '...' is based on ..."[edit]

Is the use of "The section '...' is based on ..." (see e.g. ref 37) up to today's FA standards? Doesn't it take away the WP:INTEGRITY of the sections? Also, there are many refs where the page ranges are way too broad, especially in these "The section '...' is based on ..." refs. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(Talk – Contribs)} 11:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It only becomes an INTEGRITY problem if someone inserts material not from that source and does not cite it; otherwise material in these sections can be assumed to come from that source. As to the page ranges, they seem reasonable under the circumstances. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nikkimaria may I archive this section to make way for FAR work? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Useful images?[edit]

London before and after the fire of 1666, by Wenceslas Hollar

These two images (when joined) show a panorama of London: top image before the fire, bottom after

Might these images be useful? It would be great if they could somehow be joined together better than attempted here. —2606:A000:1126:28D:6024:292F:BF55:5BD0 (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2018 (UTC) — Modified:20:31, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]