Talk:Deadpool & Wolverine

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deadpool & Wolverine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 15 days

Comics: Marvel / Films Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Comic book / Marvel Cinematic Universe / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.
	This article is supported by the Marvel Cinematic Universe task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

April 21 to 27, 2024

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Bahr, Lindsey (April 25, 2024). "'Deadpool & Wolverine' is (almost) ready to shake up the Marvel Cinematic Universe". Associated Press. Retrieved May 5, 2024.

Sequel Concern[edit]

Levy stated recently that this isn't Deadpool 3. Does that mean this isn't a sequel to the previous 2 films, or is he just teasing us and referencing films like Godzilla Vs Kong? 64.88.88.151 (talk) 16:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They want us to think of it as a true two-hander between Deadpool and Wolverine, rather than a Deadpool movie that Wolverine happens to appear in. But from a development perspective this is still the third Deadpool film. - adamstom97 (talk) 16:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so basically he's trying to have us think it's like Godzilla Vs Kong or Batman V. Superman but it's still technically a sequel to both Deadpool films just like Godzilla Vs Kong is a sequel to both Godzilla films 64.88.88.190 (talk) 16:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to comic books that have their own separate franchise with character and plot tie-ins to their own respective original universe, this is the same.

Separate note to which I hope someone can just accommodate a reply to without much of a debate on the note being within a reply; Which premium format will be the absolute best premium format for viewing that *doesn't require glasses* based on current advancements in technology? Also I believe we should be asterisking which formats require glasses (can't be the only one concerned about this). Also, currently listed formats for viewing is "IMAX, RealD 3D, Dolby Cinema, 4DX, Cinemark XD, and other premium formats" and I believe we should be investigating which are these other premium formats to have a formal list as there may be a new technology we might need to include which may be making its' debut. 207.136.91.93 (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTFORUM, this is not the place to have that discussion. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well I feel we can accommodate it as "Premium formats" is a generic term and doesn't specify. 207.136.91.93 (talk) 12:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As adam noted, we do not need to list every single format it is available in. We are not a WP:TVGUIDE. Though, I did adjust it to point directly to premium large formats and included its initialism (PLMs) as, from my experience working at movie theaters, this is a relevant aspect of release formats and provides clarity for those who may be unfamiliar with that terminology. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poster[edit]

It would be good if someone uploads the other poster? Link:[1] Maybe it would be good to have both posters in the article. 190.21.185.245 (talk) 00:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need to have both posters there. Non-free images should be kept to a minimum. —El Millo (talk) 02:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But Marvel Studios posted both posters in their social media, so I don't know. 190.21.190.250 (talk) 03:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This one was used obviously because it features Deadpool more prominently, as this is still realistically the third Deadpool film as a two-hander with Wolverine. Besides, there will be an updated theatrical release poster eventually which will supersede these two anyway, so there's no need to toy with these ones. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2024[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

add 20th century studios in the production companies Deadpoolfan2024 (talk) 13:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done we need a reliable source to support any changes to the article. - adamstom97 (talk) 13:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20th Century Studios[edit]

Should we give them a studio credit like on the Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny article? They have a copyright mention Jediknight15 (talk) 08:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has been discussed multiple times, including in the thread right above this one. We need a reliable source to confirm that 20th Century Studios is one of the production companies for this film. A copyright mark on a poster or trailer is not enough. - adamstom97 (talk) 09:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deadpool and Wolverine | 20th Century Studios Australia/New ZealandI found this on their page. That enough? Jediknight15 (talk) 01:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That page doesn't explicitly state 20th Century is a production company, and it is likely on their site because they are a copyright holder. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, per the MPA's classifications notice that included this film, it lists Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures as distributor, so if there is any official 20th Century credit, it would be as a production company (which at this time, all indications are that was not likely the case). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although for the Alien Romulus, they still credit 20th Century Studios as distributor, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures is not credited, for Deadpool & Wolverine, it would possibly that the 2021 20th Century Studios logo would appear in the movie as a variant. TCFFanmade2006YT (talk) 09:24, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have no way of knowing that yet. Even if a logo for that studio appeared, we would still need a reliable source for what its exact involvement or credit is, if any. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could suggest however that, on the other hand, Avatar 3 should list Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures as distributor rather than credited 20th Century Studios as distributor despite being one of Walt Disney Studios' production companies since Disney's acquisition of 21st Century Fox's properties in 2019. I made a question on Quora about whenever the Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures credit expect to appear in a future 20th Century film following the release of The Amateur (e.g. Avatar 3).

It would be nice if The Amateur itself becoming the last 20th Century film to credit itself as distributor when the film comes out next year if that's confirmed a day before its release on 11th April 2025? SolshineBenie (talk) 16:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the place for general discussion of 20th Century's credits on other films. Please keep comments relevant to this film. Regardless, we go by what official crediting lists, not our preference. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies then! SolshineBenie (talk) 16:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]