This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
I'm unclear what is meant by what "her proper name" would have been. The sources I know, such as Plutarch's Lives and the Bellum civile of Lucan, call her Cornelia. If this is consistent, it might indicate that despite whatever naming practices may have been conventional, this woman had a distinctive identity reflected in her name. I see elsewhere (in the currently unreferenced article on her dreadful father) that she was sometimes called Quinta Pompeia (yuck!) because she was the fifth wife of Pompey. Cynwolfe (talk) 12:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've now added a note from Jerzy Linderski, who states that Cornelia is in fact never called Caecilia in any extant sources. This point he adduces in support of his emphatic argument that her father's so-called adoption by Metellus Pius was not really an adoption. Cynwolfe (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]