Talk:Astrological sign

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 200 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Start[edit]

OK I've made a start. There's plenty more could be said about each sign. Have fun! Shantavira 12:33, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Astrological sign for graphic designers[edit]

Some artists/designers referring to this Wikipedia page might still find it difficult to reproduce the astrological signs in high-resolution details. I've found an easy way. Would someone familiar with this article please include this info in the article (in the proper place and style)?

To produce the 12 signs in a Windows environment, input "^_`abcdefghi" and apply the "Wingdings" font. Voila, you can enlarge to say 50 point font, and output your graphic file to EPS/PNG/JPG format for very fine graphic details.

I will try to demonstrate it here:

^_`abcdefghi.

Regards, Jason

Semi-protected edit request on 8 March 2024[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Hi team,

This morning, I read a page in our encyclopedia about the astrological signs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrological_sign#References) and when I reached the end of the page in the references section, I saw a thing that was not relevant and not good in our pages (in my point of view). In the fourth point, we had a link on the keyword " Signs and Constellations" and it's broken. So please replace this for a better experience also I have a suggestion for a good and informative page (https://www.astroyogi.com/zodiac-signs)

Thanks Astrosir Astrosir (talk) 07:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Wikipedia is not a platform for the promotion of random astrological websites. AndyTheGrump (talk) 07:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2024[edit]

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Astrological sign. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

I think this new scientific study could be added to this page. Please someone add it to the pargaraph starting with "Astrology is a pseudoscience....".

i suggest this:

Astrology is a pseudoscience.[3] Scientific investigations of the theoretical[4] basis and experimental verification of claims[5] have shown it to have no scientific validity or explanatory power. A scientific study, for example, found that zodiac signs are no better than random numbers in predicting life outcomes (citation)"

The sun's position at birth is unrelated to subjective well-being: Debunking astrological claims https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12395 Astroresearchh (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]