This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
I'm starting a new discussion, since the previous one has been archived: so, what do we do with the infobox? it is quite clear that the current one is absolutely inadequate. I remain of the same opinion: we must restore the {{Infobox election}} and if an alternative solution is not found it seems to me to be the only practicable way. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 19:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have unarchived the previous discussion, in which some proposals were made (here) on which comments would be welcome. Like 沁水湾, I think option 1 works best. Number57 23:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion was archived again. However, the point is: if a solution for mixed systems is not provided, the previous infobox will necessarily have to be restored. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 21:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It will not "have to be restored" – what happens next (if anything) is dependent on consensus being reached here. An alternative to the current infobox has been proposed though for comment. Number57 22:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't seem to me like you ever sought consensus when you changed the infobox, if I were to restore the previous infobox I wouldn't do anything very different. In any case your proposal is a step forward, but you should create that infobox and replace it in all Korean elections (but also in Japanese, Russian, Venezuelan and Thai elections). Personally, in any case, I prefer the {{Infobox election}}. And a solution must also be found for the French elections, given that there too you replaced a suitable infobox with an unsuitable one. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 16:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't change the infobox, and the editor that did didn't need to seek consensus as it was a bold edit that no-one objected to (seeking consensus would only be required if their change was reverted within a reasonable timescale).
Anyway it would be good to know if anyone else has any views on the alternative proposal. Number57 23:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
