Draft:Story Sharing Cubes
| Submission declined on 7 May 2024 by ToadetteEdit (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: The tone is not what people would expect in an encyclopedic article. ToadetteEdit! 14:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
The Story Sharing Cube (SSC) initiative aims to refine qualitative, in-situ data collection methodologies in high-uncertainty and complex environments. It also seeks to deepen scientific understanding of the impact of transformative festival cultures while simultaneously supporting community development efforts by sharing of anonymized data back to the communities.
The testing and development settings for the devices since 2019 have resembled week-long transformative festivals.[1], such as Burning Man, where participants often undergo life-altering experiences. This was evidenced by a study published in Nature Communications in 2022[2].
Methodology[edit]
SSC is philosophically grounded to an assumption that people often attribute meaning to their experiences through stories [3].Methodologically, in situ narratives refer to stories collected directly in the environment where they naturally occur. The main difference between in situ methodology and thematic interview methodology lies in their data collection methods and context[4] . In in situ methodology, information is collected passively in its natural environment, capturing spontaneous expressions and interactions, whereas interview data is actively collected through direct questions and interaction between the interviewer and interviewee. In situ narratives provide a less filtered and more contextualized perspective because they are recorded in real-time in a natural environment, while interview data may be influenced by external factors due to the structure of interview questions[5].
Outputs on the method (2019-)[edit]
- Field research report on the 2019 Burning Man and Borderland events in article Transformation Through Connection? Insights From a Pilot Study of Story Sharing Cubes [1].
- Conference publication on preliminary data analysis in conference paper Exploring psychedelic experiences: Insights from narrative collections in transformational festivals [6].
- Master's thesis on the usability of Story Sharing Cubes Co-designing the Story Sharing Cube: a novel experience-driven data collection method for exploring transformative experiences in participatory culture communities[7].
- The methodology and its potential applications in artificial intelligence have been discussed in article From Myth to Cyberrealism? An Overview of the Joint Future of Artificial Intelligence and Art.[8]
- The data has been so far used outside publications in sound art [9], in community journal posting [10] and discussed for possible application in war zones [11].
References[edit]
- ^ a b Toomistu, Terje; Heikkilä, Jukka-Pekka (2020-11-16). "Transformation Through Connection? Insights From a Pilot Study of Story Sharing Cubes at Burning Man Events". Dancecult. 12 (1). doi:10.12801/1947-5403.2020.12.01.07.
- ^ Yudkin, Daniel A.; Prosser, Annayah M. B.; Heller, S. Megan; McRae, Kateri; Chakroff, Aleksandr; Crockett, M. J. (2022-05-27). "Prosocial correlates of transformative experiences at secular multi-day mass gatherings". Nature Communications. 13 (1): 2600. Bibcode:2022NatCo..13.2600Y. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29600-1. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 9142525. PMID 35624086.
- ^ Vaara, Eero; Sonenshein, Scott; Boje, David (January 2016). "Narratives as Sources of Stability and Change in Organizations: Approaches and Directions for Future Research". Academy of Management Annals. 10 (1): 495–560. doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1120963. ISSN 1941-6520.
- ^ Van De Mieroop, Dorien; Clifton, Jonathan; Schnurr, Stephanie (2022-01-31). "Narratives as social practice in organisational contexts". Narrative Inquiry. 32 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1075/ni.21090.van. ISSN 1387-6740.
- ^ Celuch, Krzysztof; Neuhofer, Barbara (2024-01-29). "Transformative event experiences: a visual in-situ study of change". Current Issues in Tourism: 1–22. doi:10.1080/13683500.2024.2309147. ISSN 1368-3500. S2CID 267416174.
- ^ Heikkilä, J-P.; Toomistu, T. (2023). "Exploring psychedelic experiences: Insights from narrative collections in transformational festivals" (PDF). The 2nd Finnish Interdisciplinary Conference on Psychedelics 11/ 2023 Åbo Akademi, Turku, Finland.
- ^ Ruijs, Hilda (2021). "Co-designing the Story Sharing Cube a novel experience driven data collection method for exploring transformative experiences in participatory culture communities". Aalto University Press. Master thesis.
- ^ Heikkilä, Jukka-Pekka (2021). "From Myth to Cyberrealism? An Overview of the Joint Future of Artificial Intelligence and Art". Futura (in English abstract and article in Finnish). 21 (1). ISSN 0785-5494.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link) - ^ Heikinpoika, Mikko. "Love & Acceptance". Spotify library. Retrieved 13 Feb 2024.
- ^ Goodell, Marian (9 Feb 2019). "Cultural Course Correcting: Black Rock City". Burning Man Journal. Retrieved 13 Feb 2024.
- ^ Magnrum, Stuart (14 Oct 2021). "Dr Heikkilä and the Science of Participatory Culture". Burning Man Live. Retrieved 13 Feb 2024.