This category is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
It's irrelevant. Hermeticism is not exclusively Ancient Egyptian and does not belong in the category. If you find references (and Manly P. Hall's imagination does not count), then I will survey the editors of the article about this too. In fact, I may start right away. Stop trying to force your original ideas and biases on WP. They aren't wanted. Didn't you get the hint when half your articles were deleted in AfD? —Hanuman Das 17:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't have to be exclusively Ancient Egyptian. Please point out any policy that says so. Hitler is not exclusively an artist, nor exclusively a politician or a dictator. Yet he'd be tagged for those. And if you cite Hall for the point, and knowing that he is dead and I am not him, it wouldn't be an original idea. In fact, I can cite several sources, I just need to get them in my hands, they are not accessible from work on my break.
Oh, I'm pretty sure that I'm not the only person who disagrees with this. Seems you haven't yet figured out what battles are worth fighting and what are not (hint, as soon as it become two to one, you've lost). Maybe you could justify putting the article into the category, but not the whole category, since most of the things in the category are clearly post-Egyptian. —Hanuman Das 18:07, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll be one of the others who disagree until you provide acurate information. SynergeticMaggot 18:25, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]