User talk:Sametscientia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Sametscofield)

November 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at BioNTech, you may be blocked from editing. Go to the talk page and get consensus for your view, WP:CON. There is an open discussion on this topic. Warning: you have reached WP:3RR and are in danger of being blocked. Zefr (talk) 23:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Kirkuk shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not me who started the edit war, it's the Turkish nationalists. If you look at the history, you will see that the city of Kirkuk was not historically Turkish. Best regards Sametscientia (talk) 17:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]